首页> 外文期刊>Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists >Bowel sparing in pediatric cranio-spinal radiotherapy: A comparison of combined electron and photon and helical TomoTherapy techniques to a standard photon method
【24h】

Bowel sparing in pediatric cranio-spinal radiotherapy: A comparison of combined electron and photon and helical TomoTherapy techniques to a standard photon method

机译:小儿颅脊髓放射治疗中的肠备用:电子和光子联合以及螺旋TomoTherapy技术与标准光子方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the dose to organs at risk (OARs) from different craniospinal radiotherapy treatment approaches available at the Northern Centre for Cancer Care (NCCC), with a particular emphasis on sparing the bowel. Method: Treatment plans were produced for a pediatric medulloblastoma patient with inflammatory bowel disease using 3D conformal 6-MV photons (3DCP), combined 3D 6-MV photons and 18-MeV electrons (3DPE), and helical photon TomoTherapy (HT). The 3DPE plan was a modification of the standard 3DCP technique, using electrons to treat the spine inferior to the level of the diaphragm. The plans were compared in terms of the dose-volume data to OARs and the nontumor integral dose. Results: The 3DPE plan was found to give the lowest dose to the bowel and the lowest nontumor integral dose of the 3 techniques. However, the coverage of the spine planning target volume (PTV) was least homogeneous using this technique, with only 74.6% of the PTV covered by 95% of the prescribed dose. HT was able to achieve the best coverage of the PTVs (99.0% of the whole-brain PTV and 93.1% of the spine PTV received 95% of the prescribed dose), but delivered a significantly higher integral dose. HT was able to spare the heart, thyroid, and eyes better than the linac-based techniques, but other OARs received a higher dose. Conclusions: Use of electrons was the best method for reducing the dose to the bowel and the integral dose, at the expense of compromised spine PTV coverage. For some patients, HT may be a viable method of improving dose homogeneity and reducing selected OAR doses.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较北方癌症护理中心(NCCC)提供的不同颅骨脊柱放疗方法对处于危险中的器官(OAR)的剂量,并特别强调避免肠蠕动。方法:使用3D保形6-MV光子(3DCP),3D 6-MV光子和18-MeV电子(3DPE)以及螺旋光子TomoTherapy(HT),为患有炎症性肠病的小儿髓母细胞瘤患者制定治疗计划。 3DPE计划是对标准3DCP技术的修改,使用电子来治疗脊椎低于隔膜水平的脊柱。根据针对OAR的剂量-体积数据和非肿瘤积分剂量比较了计划。结果:发现3DPE计划为3种技术提供了最低的肠剂量和最低的非肿瘤积分剂量。但是,使用该技术后,脊柱计划目标体积(PTV)的覆盖范围最不均匀,只有74.6%的PTV被95%的处方剂量覆盖。 HT能够达到PTV的最佳覆盖范围(全脑PTV的99.0%和脊柱PTV的93.1%接受了规定剂量的95%),但提供了更高的积分剂量。与基于直线加速器的技术相比,HT能够更好地拯救心脏,甲状腺和眼睛,但其他OAR的剂量更高。结论:使用电子是减少肠道剂量和总剂量的最佳方法,但会损害脊柱PTV的覆盖范围。对于某些患者,HT可能是提高剂量均匀性并减少所选OAR剂量的可行方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号