...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical law review >Determining best interests under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. In the matter of G (TJ) (2010) EWHC 3005 (COP).
【24h】

Determining best interests under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. In the matter of G (TJ) (2010) EWHC 3005 (COP).

机译:根据《 2005年心理能力法案》确定最大利益。关于G(TJ)(2010)EWHC 3005(COP)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The decision in In the Matter of G (TJ) concerns the application of the best interests standard introduced by section 4 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). The case itself concerns an application to the Court of Protection for an order, from the funds of a woman lacking capacity, for maintenance payments in favour of her daughter. Since the introduction of the MCA, decisions like this, which concern 'property and affairs', are determined according to the same standard as decisions in respect of health and welfare. Accordingly, the decision provides useful general insights into the operation of the MCA best interests standard. However, as will be seen, there are important differences between decisions in respect of property and affairs and decisions in respect of health and welfare and a degree of caution is appropriate in drawing general conclusions. This commentary discusses the decision in In the Matter of G (TJ), together with other recent decisions in respect of property and affairs, and assesses their contribution beyond their immediate context.
机译:《 G事项》(TJ)中的决定涉及2005年《心理能力法案》(MCA)第4节引入的最佳利益标准。案件本身涉及向保护法院申请从缺乏能力的妇女的资金中下达命令,以抚养女儿的payments养费。自MCA引入以来,涉及“财产与事务”的此类决定是根据与健康和福利决定相同的标准来确定的。因此,该决定为MCA最高利益标准的运作提供了有用的一般见解。但是,可以看出,财产和事务方面的决定与健康与福利方面的决定之间存在重要差异,在得出一般性结论时应谨慎行事。这篇评论讨论了《 G事项》(TJ)中的决定,以及有关财产和事务的其他近期决定,并评估了其在当前环境之外的贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号