首页> 外文期刊>Medical care >Development and Evaluation of CAHPS Questions to Assess the Impact of Health Information Technology on Patient Experiences With Ambulatory Care
【24h】

Development and Evaluation of CAHPS Questions to Assess the Impact of Health Information Technology on Patient Experiences With Ambulatory Care

机译:CAHPS问题的开发和评估,以评估健康信息技术对门诊患者体验的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Little is known about whether health information technology (HIT) affects patient experiences with health care.Objective: To develop HIT questions that assess patients care experiences not evaluated by existing ambulatory Consumer Assessment of Health Plans and Systems (CAHPS) measures.Research Design: We reviewed published articles and conducted focus groups and cognitive testing to develop survey questions. We collected data, using mail and the internet, from patients of 69 physicians receiving care at an academic medical center and 2 regional integrated delivery systems in late 2009 and 2010. We evaluated questions and scales about HIT using factor analysis, item-scale correlations, and reliability (internal consistency and physician-level) estimates.Results: We found support for 3 HIT composites: doctor use of computer (2 items), e-mail (2 items), and helpfulness of provider's website (4 items). Corrected item-scale correlations were 0.37 for the 2 doctor use of computer items and 0.71 for the 2 e-mail items, and ranged from 0.50 to 0.60 for the provider's website items. Cronbach a was high for e-mail (0.83) and provider's website (0.75), but only 0.54 for doctor use of computer. As few as 50 responses per physician would yield reliability of 0.70 for e-mail and provider's website. Two HIT composites, doctor use of computer (P<0.001) and provider's website (P = 0.02), were independent predictors of overall ratings of doctors.Conclusions: New CAHPS HIT items were identified that measure aspects of patient experiences not assessed by the CAHPS C&G 1.0 survey.
机译:背景:关于健康信息技术(HIT)是否会影响患者的医疗保健服务知之甚少。目的:开发HIT问题来评估现有的非流动性消费者健康计划和系统(CAHPS)措施无法评估的患者护理经验。 :我们审查了已发表的文章,并进行了焦点小组和认知测试,以提出调查问题。我们通过邮件和互联网收集了2009年末和2010年末在一家学术医疗中心和2个地区综合交付系统中接受治疗的69位医生的患者的数据。我们使用因子分析,项目规模相关性,结果:我们发现支持3种HIT复合材料:医生使用计算机(2件),电子邮件(2件)和提供商网站的帮助(4件)。校正后的项目规模相关性是2位医生使用计算机项目时为0.37,2封电子邮件项目中为0.71,提供商网站项目在0.50到0.60之间。 Cronbach a的电子邮件(0.83)和提供商的网站(0.75)较高,但医生使用计算机的比率仅为0.54。每位医生只有50次回复,对于电子邮件和提供商网站的可靠性为0.70。医生使用计算机(P <0.001)和医疗服务提供者的网站(P = 0.02)这两种HIT综合指标是对医生总体评价的独立预测指标。 C&G 1.0调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号