...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical care >The mortality risk score and the ADG score: two points-based scoring systems for the johns hopkins aggregated diagnosis groups to predict mortality in a general adult population cohort in Ontario, Canada.
【24h】

The mortality risk score and the ADG score: two points-based scoring systems for the johns hopkins aggregated diagnosis groups to predict mortality in a general adult population cohort in Ontario, Canada.

机译:死亡率风险评分和ADG评分:约翰·霍普金斯病的两个基于得分的评分系统汇总了诊断组,以预测加拿大安大略省普通成年人群的死亡率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Logistic regression models that incorporated age, sex, and indicator variables for the Johns Hopkins' Aggregated Diagnosis Groups (ADGs) categories have been shown to accurately predict all-cause mortality in adults. OBJECTIVES: To develop 2 different point-scoring systems using the ADGs. The Mortality Risk Score (MRS) collapses age, sex, and the ADGs to a single summary score that predicts the annual risk of all-cause death in adults. The ADG Score derives weights for the individual ADG diagnosis groups. RESEARCH DESIGN: : Retrospective cohort constructed using population-based administrative data. PARTICIPANTS: All 10,498,413 residents of Ontario, Canada, between the age of 20 and 100 years who were alive on their birthday in 2007, participated in this study. Participants were randomly divided into derivation and validation samples. MEASURES: : Death within 1 year. RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, the MRS ranged from -21 to 139 (median value 29, IQR 17 to 44). In the validation group, a logistic regression model with the MRS as the sole predictor significantly predicted the risk of 1-year mortality with a c-statistic of 0.917. A regression model with age, sex, and the ADG Score has similar performance. Both methods accurately predicted the risk of 1-year mortality across the 20 vigintiles of risk. CONCLUSIONS: The MRS combined values for a person's age, sex, and the John Hopkins ADGs to accurately predict 1-year mortality in adults. The ADG Score is a weighted score representing the presence or absence of the 32 ADG diagnosis groups. These scores will facilitate health services researchers conducting risk adjustment using administrative health care databases.
机译:背景:已证明结合了约翰·霍普金斯综合诊断组(ADG)类别的年龄,性别和指标变量的逻辑回归模型可以准确预测成年人的全因死亡率。目的:使用ADG开发两种不同的计分系统。死亡率风险评分(MRS)将年龄,性别和ADG分解为一个汇总评分,该评分可预测成人全因死亡的年度风险。 ADG分数得出各个ADG诊断组的权重。研究设计::使用基于人群的行政数据构建回顾性队列。参与者:2007年生日时还活着的加拿大安大略省所有10,498,413位居民,年龄在20至100岁之间,均参加了这项研究。参与者被随机分为派生样本和验证样本。措施::一年内死亡。结果:在派生队列中,MRS范围从-21到139(中值29,IQR 17到44)。在验证组中,以MRS作为唯一预测因子​​的logistic回归模型可显着预测1年死亡率的风险,c统计值为0.917。具有年龄,性别和ADG分数的回归模型具有相似的性能。两种方法都可以准确预测20个风险人群中1年死亡的风险。结论:MRS结合了一个人的年龄,性别和John Hopkins ADG值,以准确预测成年人的1年死亡率。 ADG得分是一个加权得分,代表32个ADG诊断组的存在与否。这些分数将有助于卫生服务研究人员使用行政医疗数据库进行风险调整。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号