首页> 外文期刊>Medical Journal Armed Forces India >Real time ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheostomy: Is it a better option than bronchoscopic guided percutaneous tracheostomy?
【24h】

Real time ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheostomy: Is it a better option than bronchoscopic guided percutaneous tracheostomy?

机译:实时超声引导下经皮气管切开术:是否比支气管镜引导下经皮气管切开术更好?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound guided percutaneous tracheostomy (USPCT) and bronchoscopic guided percutaneous tracheostomy (BPCT) and the incidence of complications in critically ill, obese patients. Methods: Seventy four consecutive patients were included in a prospective study and randomly divided into USPCT and BPCT. Incidence of complications, ease and efficacy were compared in obese USPCT (n = 38)and BPCT (n = 36). Results are expressed as the median (25th-75th percentile) or number (percentage).Results: The median times for tracheostomy were 12 min (9-14) in USPCT patients and 18 min (12-21.5) in BPCT (p = 0.05). The overall complication rate was higher in BPCT than USPCT patient group (75% vs. 321%, p < 0.05). Most complications were minor (hypotension, desaturation, tracheal cuff puncture and minor bleeding) and of higher number in the BPCT. Ultrasound-guided PCT was possible in all enrolled patients and there were no surgical conversions or deaths.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that real US-guided PCT is a favourable alternative to BPCT with a low complication rate and ease, thus proving more efficacious. A US examination provides information on cervical anatomy, vasculature etc. and hence modifies and guides choice of the PCT puncture site.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是评估超声引导下经皮气管切开术(USPCT)和支气管镜引导下经皮气管切开术(BPCT)的疗效以及重症肥胖患者并发症的发生率。方法:将74例连续患者纳入前瞻性研究,并随机分为USPCT和BPCT。在肥胖的USPCT(n = 38)和BPCT(n = 36)中比较了并发症,缓解和疗效的发生率。结果以中位数(25-75%)或数字(百分比)表示。结果:USPCT患者气管切开术的中位时间为12分钟(9-14),而BPCT患者为18分钟(12-21.5)(p = 0.05) )。 BPCT的总并发症发生率高于USPCT患者组(75%比321%,p <0.05)。大多数并发症是轻度的(低血压,去饱和,气管袖套穿刺和轻微的出血),而在BPCT中并发症的发生率更高。超声引导下的PCT在所有入组患者中都是可行的,并且没有手术转换或死亡。结论:这项研究表明,真正的美国引导下的PCT是BPCT的良好替代方案,并发症发生率低,操作简便,因此被证明更为有效。美国检查可提供有关宫颈解剖结构,脉管系统等的信息,因此可以修改和指导PCT穿刺部位的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号