首页> 外文期刊>MCN: American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing >Coordinated by Kathleen Leask Capitulo, DNSc, RN, FACCE
【24h】

Coordinated by Kathleen Leask Capitulo, DNSc, RN, FACCE

机译:由Kathleen Leask Capitulo,DNSc,RN,FACCE协调

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Although there are reasons to support the DNP degree, I believe that we should not mandate the DNP for APNs by the year 2015, as proposed by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). One of the major criticisms is the notion that the DNP will place nursing more on par with the education of MDs and PharmDs (AACN, 2004, 2006). Most disciplines that prepare licensed independent practitioners (e.g., podiatrists, psychologists, optometrists, PharmDs, osteopaths, medical doctors, and dentists) have the doctorate as the entry into practice degree. Nursing does not. Nursing has, as we all know, multiple educational routes into the profession and has relied on the master's degree for advanced practice. One problem with the DNP, therefore, is the concern that a transition to clinical doctoral preparation for nurse practitioners will disenfranchise master's prepared practitioners; we must guard against this happening (American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 2006).
机译:尽管有理由支持DNP学位,但我认为我们不应该像美国护理学院协会(AACN)所建议的那样,在2015年之前为APNs规定DNP。一项主要的批评意见是,DNP将使护理更多地与MD和PharmD的教育并驾齐驱(AACN,2004,2006)。准备执照的独立执业者的大多数学科(例如,足病医生,心理学家,验光师,PharmDs,整骨医生,医生和牙医)都将博士学位作为实践学位。护理没有。众所周知,护理进入该专业有多种教育途径,并且依靠硕士学位进行高级实践。因此,DNP的问题之一是担心护士执业医师过渡到临床博士学位预备制会剥夺硕士预备执业医师的资格;我们必须防止这种情况的发生(美国护士执业医师学会,2006)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号