首页> 外文期刊>Marine Mammal Science >A BIOPSY POLE SYSTEM FOR BOW-RIDING DOLPHINS: SAMPLING SUCCESS, BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES, AND TEST FOR SAMPLING BIAS
【24h】

A BIOPSY POLE SYSTEM FOR BOW-RIDING DOLPHINS: SAMPLING SUCCESS, BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES, AND TEST FOR SAMPLING BIAS

机译:用于海豚骑行的双鱼竿系统:采样成功,行为响应以及对偏置的测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The collection of biopsy samples from free-ranging cetaceans has proven useful for addressing questions regarding population and social structure (e.g., Baker et al. 1990), evolutionary relationships (e.g., LeDuc et al. 1999), feeding ecology (e.g., Walker et al. 1999), and contaminant levels (e.g., Fossi et al. 2000). In the past, modified crossbows and rifles have been used to sample both large and small cetaceans (e.g., Weinrich et al. 1991, Barrett-Lennard et al. 1996, Krutzen et al. 2002). These systems have been shown to elicit only short-term behavioral responses by sampled animals, and no physiological complications have been reported during wound healing (e.g., Weller et al. 1997, Kriitzen et al. 2002). The International Whaling Commissionhas deemed these methods acceptable because there is no evidence of long-term detrimental effects to sampled individuals or populations (International Whaling Commission 1991). However, such techniques are not without risk. For example, the use of a crossbow has led to the death of a common dolphin (Delpbinus delpbis) in the central Mediterranean Sea (Bearzi 2000). Less invasive techniques to obtain tissue samples from free-ranging small cetaceans are desirable, and other methods developed for this purpose include skin swabbing (Harlin et al. 1999) and fecal sampling(Parsons et al. 1999). When selecting a sampling technique, the conservation status of the species and target population, as well as the potential behavioral response of the animals to sampling, should be considered. It is also important to assess if the research question can be answered with the amount of tissue obtained with a specific technique.
机译:事实证明,从自由放养的鲸类动物中收集活检样本对于解决有关人口和社会结构(例如Baker等人1990),进化关系(例如LeDuc等人1999),喂养生态学(例如Walker等人)是有用的。 (1999年)和污染物水平(例如,Fossi等,2000年)。过去,改良的cross和步枪已用于对大型和小型鲸类进行采样(例如,Weinrich等,1991; Barrett-Lennard等,1996; Krutzen等,2002)。已经证明这些系统仅能引起被采样动物的短期行为反应,并且在伤口愈合过程中没有生理并发症的报道(例如,Weller等,1997; Kriitzen等,2002)。国际捕鲸委员会认为这些方法是可以接受的,因为没有证据表明对采样的个人或人群有长期的有害影响(国际捕鲸委员会,1991)。但是,这样的技术并非没有风险。例如,cross的使用导致了地中海中部海豚的死亡(Delpbinus delpbis)(Bearzi 2000)。从自由放养的小鲸类动物中获取组织样本的侵入性较小的技术是理想的,为此目的开发的其他方法包括皮肤擦拭(Harlin等,1999)和粪便采样(Parsons等,1999)。选择采样技术时,应考虑物种和目标种群的保护状况以及动物对采样的潜在行为响应。评估是否可以用特定技术获得的组织数量回答研究问题也很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号