【24h】

Responsible Sourcing in Supply Chains

机译:供应链中的负责任采购

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We analyze the sourcing decision of a buyer choosing between two supplier types: responsible suppliers are costly but adhere to strict social and environmental responsibility standards, whereas risky suppliers are less expensive but may experience responsibility violations. A segment of the consumer population, called socially conscious, is willing to pay a higher price for a product sourced from a responsible supplier and may not purchase in the event of a responsibility violation from a risky supplier. We identify four possible sourcing strategies that a buyer might employ: low cost sourcing (sourcing from the risky supplier), dual sourcing, responsible niche sourcing (sourcing from a responsible supplier and selling only to socially conscious consumers), and responsible mass market sourcing (sourcing responsibly and selling to all consumers). We determine when each strategy is optimal and show that efforts to improve supply chain responsibility that focus on consumers (by increasing their willingness to pay for responsibility or increasing the number of consumers that are socially conscious) or increasing supply chain transparency may lead to unintended consequences, such as an increase in risky sourcing. Efforts that focus on enforcement and penalizing the buyer, however, never backfire and always lead to more responsible sourcing and less risky sourcing.
机译:我们分析了在两种供应商类型之间进行选择的买方的采购决策:负责任的供应商成本高昂,但遵守严格的社会和环境责任标准,而有风险的供应商价格较低,但可能会违反责任。一部分有社会意识的消费者群体愿意为从负责任的供应商处购买的产品支付更高的价格,并且如果从有风险的供应商处违反责任,则可能不会购买。我们确定了买方可能采用的四种可能的采购策略:低成本采购(从有风险的供应商那里采购),双重采购,负责任的利基采购(从负责任的供应商那里采购并仅销售给有社会意识的消费者)和负责任的大众市场采购(负责任地采购并销售给所有消费者)。我们确定每种策略何时是最佳选择,并表明改善针对消费者的供应链责任的努力(通过增加他们承担责任的意愿或增加具有社会意识的消费者数量)或提高供应链透明度可能会导致意想不到的后果,例如风​​险资源的增加。但是,着眼于执法和对买方进行惩罚的努力永远不会适得其反,并总是导致负责任的采购和降低风险的采购。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号