首页> 外文期刊>Marine Geology >An analysis of the cross-shore beach morphodynamics of a sandy and a composite gravel beach
【24h】

An analysis of the cross-shore beach morphodynamics of a sandy and a composite gravel beach

机译:含沙砾和复合砾石海滩的跨岸海滩形态动力学分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this paper, beach profile surveys acquired over more than a decade at a sandy beach (Narrabeen Beach, New South Wales, Australia) and a composite sand-gravel beach (Milford-on-Sea, Christchurch Bay, UK) are analysed to compare and contrast cross-shore morphodynamics of the two beach types. The different behavioural characteristics of the two beach types at decadal, inter-annual and intra-annual time scales are investigated. Comparisons of beach profiles with Dean's equilibrium profile and Vellinga's erosion profile show that the Dean's profile satisfactorily represents the time mean profiles of both beach types. Statistical and Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analyses confirm the generally accepted model that the inter-tidal zone is the most morphodynamically active region on a sandy beach whereas the swash zone is the most dynamic region on a mixed sand-gravel beach. The results also imply that during storms composite sand-gravel beaches may become unstable due to cutback of the upper beach while sandy beaches are more likely to be unstable as a result of beach lowering due to sediment transport from the inter-tidal zone to the sub-tidal zone during storms. EOF results also show that Milford-on-Sea beach is in a state of steady recession while the Narrabeen Beach shows a cyclic erosion-accretion variability. A multivariate technique (Canonical Correlation Analysis, CCA) shows that on the composite beach a strong correlation exists between incident wave steepness and profile response, which could be attributed to the unsaturated surf zone, whereas on the sandy beach any correlation is much less evident.
机译:在本文中,分析了十多年来在沙滩(澳大利亚新南威尔士州的纳拉比恩海滩)和复合砂石海滩(英国基督城海湾的米尔福德海岸)上进行的海滩剖面调查,以进行比较和对比两种海滩类型的跨海岸形态动力学。研究了两种海滩类型在年代际,年度间和年度内的不同行为特征。将海滩剖面与Dean的平衡剖面和Vellinga的侵蚀剖面进行比较表明,Dean的剖面令人满意地代表了两种海滩类型的时间平均剖面。统计和经验正交函数(EOF)分析证实了公认的模型,即潮间带是沙滩上形态动力学最活跃的区域,而斜盘带是混合砂砾沙滩上最活跃的区域。结果还暗示,在暴风雨期间,复合砂砾海滩可能由于上层海滩的缩减而变得不稳定,而沙质海滩更可能是由于沉积物从潮间带到次要区域的迁移而导致海滩下降而导致不稳定的。风暴期间的潮汐带。 EOF结果还表明,海上米尔福德海滩处于稳定的衰退状态,而纳拉宾海滩则表现出周期性的侵蚀累积变化。多元技术(规范相关分析,CCA)表明,在复合海滩上,入射波陡度和剖面响应之间存在很强的相关性,这可能归因于非饱和冲浪带,而在沙滩上,任何相关性都不太明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号