...
首页> 外文期刊>Magnetic resonance in medicine: official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine >Influence of the k-space trajectory on the dynamic T1-weighted signal in quantitative first-pass cardiac perfusion MRI at 3T.
【24h】

Influence of the k-space trajectory on the dynamic T1-weighted signal in quantitative first-pass cardiac perfusion MRI at 3T.

机译:在3T时定量k次轨迹灌注心脏MRI中,k空间轨迹对动态T1加权信号的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The dynamic T(1)-weighted signal in first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI can vary as a function of k-space trajectory. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to compare the relative T(1)-weighted signal produced by the linear, centric, and reverse centric k-space trajectories at 3T. The centric k-space trajectory yielded higher arterial input function (AIF) than the linear and reverse centric k-space trajectories (6.21 +/- 0.84 vs. 4.75 +/- 0.75 vs. 4.39 +/- 0.85 mM, respectively; N = 9; P < 0.01), and the reverse centric k-space trajectory yielded higher myocardial signal contrast (as a fraction of equilibrium magnetization) than the linear and centric k-space trajectories (0.17 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.12 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.05 +/- 0.01, respectively; N = 9; P < 0.001). Compared to the linear k-space trajectory, the centric k-space trajectory is relatively optimal for the quantification of AIF, whereas the reverse centric k-space trajectory is relatively optimal for high contrast of myocardial wall enhancement.
机译:动态的T(1)加权信号在首次通过心肌灌注MRI中可能会随着k空间轨迹的变化而变化。因此,本研究的目的是比较3T处线性,中心和反向中心k空间轨迹产生的相对T(1)加权信号。中心k空间轨迹产生的动脉输入函数(AIF)高于线性和反向中心k空间轨迹(分别为6.21 +/- 0.84 vs. 4.75 +/- 0.75 vs. 4.39 +/- 0.85 mM; N = 9; P <0.01),并且反向中心k空间轨迹产生的心肌信号对比度(作为平衡磁化的一部分)比线性和中心k空间轨迹(0.17 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.12 +/- 0.02)更高分别为0.05 +/- 0.01; N = 9; P <0.001)。与线性k空间轨迹相比,中心k空间轨迹对于AIF的量化是相对最佳的,而反向中心k空间轨迹对于心肌壁增强的高对比度则相对最优。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号