首页> 外文期刊>Mammalian Biology >Habitat use of coexisting introduced eastern cottontail and native European hare
【24h】

Habitat use of coexisting introduced eastern cottontail and native European hare

机译:共存的引进东部棉尾和欧洲本地野兔的栖息地利用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The niche of introduced species and that of native ones may overlap, thus causing detrimental effects on the latter through competitive interactions. We used radio telemetry to investigate habitat partitioning during the active period by the introduced American eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) and the native European hare (Lepus europaeus) in sympatric conditions. Home ranges of cottontails varied from 1.1-2.2 ha in autumn to 3.0-3.6 ha in summer. In hares, home ranges were 30.5-33.8 ha insummer and increased to 49.5-85.9 ha in winter. Both species used an overall area composed of about 27% of natural habitats (i.e., meadows, woodlands, shrubby habitats, shores, and uncultivated land) and over 70% of field crops. The coexistence of the two species appeared to be facilitated by habitat partitioning. Habitat use of cottontails was characterized by a preference for natural habitats at the study area level as well as within the home ranges, while hares showed a preference for crop fields atboth spatial scales and a seasonal selection of meadows within home ranges. Habitat overlap measured with the Pianka index was 0.57-0.64 in autumn and winter, and increased in summer and spring to 0.73-0.78. Our results provide evidence of different resource selection strategies adopted by these two sympatric lagomorph species. Hare populations are often found in agricultural landscapes at low-densities, while cottontails are currently spreading throughout Northern Italy to such an extent that an eradication programme appears unfeasible. In this situation, conservation measures for hares and other species should also take into consideration the presence or possible arrival of cottontails. Habitat restoration measures that would increase the amount of fallow lands and shrublands may favour cottontails more than hares. In areas where introduced lagomorphs are present, the necessity of natural open landscapes for hares may be better faced by increasing the presence of meadows, that are seasonally used byhares and not by cottontails.
机译:引进物种的生态位和原生物种的生态位可能重叠,从而通过竞争相互作用对后者造成不利影响。我们使用无线电遥测技术研究了活动期间由引入的美国东部棉尾(Sylvilagus floridanus)和欧洲原生野兔(Lepus europaeus)在同伴条件下的栖息地划分。棉尾虫的居所范围从秋天的1.1-2.2公顷到夏天的3.0-3.6公顷不等。在野兔中,家庭活动范围是夏季的30.5-33.8公顷,冬季则增加到49.5-85.9公顷。两种物种的总面积约占自然栖息地的27%(即草地,林地,灌木丛生境,海岸和未耕地)和超过70%的田间作物。栖息地的划分促进了这两种物种的共存。棉尾虫栖息地的使用特点是在研究区域以及家庭范围内偏爱自然栖息地,而野兔则在空间范围内偏爱作物田和家庭范围内的季节性草甸。用Pianka指数测得的生境重叠在秋季和冬季为0.57-0.64,在夏季和春季增加到0.73-0.78。我们的结果提供了证据,证明这两种同胞异形体物种采用了不同的资源选择策略。野兔种群通常在低密度的农业景观中发现,而棉尾目前在整个意大利北部蔓延,以至于消除根除计划似乎不可行。在这种情况下,对野兔和其他物种的保护措施也应考虑到存在或可能到来的棉尾。恢复生境的措施可能会增加休耕地和灌木地的数量,而不是野兔。在存在引入的兔类动物的地区,可通过增加草甸的存在来更好地面对野兔的自然开放景观的必要性,而草甸通常是由野兔而非棉尾使用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号