...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Validation of the DeLiT Trial intravenous insulin infusion algorithm for intraoperative glucose control in noncardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Validation of the DeLiT Trial intravenous insulin infusion algorithm for intraoperative glucose control in noncardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

机译:在非心脏手术中术中控制葡萄糖的DeLiT试验静脉胰岛素输注算法的验证:一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: A safe and effective insulin infusion algorithm that achieves rigorous intraoperative glycemic control in noncardiac surgery has yet to be formally characterized and evaluated. We therefore report the validation of the DeLit Trial insulin infusion algorithm. METHODS: Patients scheduled for major noncardiac surgery were randomized to a target intraoperative blood glucose concentration of 4.4-6.1 mmoL.L(-1) (80-110 mg.dL(-1)) intensive group or 10-11.1 mmoL.L(-1) (180-200 mg.dL(-1)) conventional group. Glucose was managed with a dynamic intravenous insulin infusion algorithm. We compared the randomized groups on glucose time-weighted average (TWA), proportion of time spent within target, number of severe (< 2.2 mmoL.L(-1) or < 40 mg.dL(-1)) or moderate (< 2.8 mmoL.L(-1) or < 50 mg.dL(-1)) hypoglycemic episodes, and within-patient variability in glucose concentrations expressed as standard deviation from the patient mean. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven patients were assigned to intensive glucose control, and 177 patients were assigned to conventional glucose control. Median (lower quartile value [Q1], upper quartile value [Q3]) of intraoperative TWA for the intensive vs conventional groups was 6 [5.6, 6.7] mmoL.L(-1) vs 7.7 [6.9, 9.2] mmoL.L(-1), respectively; P < 0.001. The intensive group spent 49% (29, 71) of the time within target, substantially more time than the conventional group spent either within the intensive target or within its own target (both P < 0.001). The intensive group had slightly lower within-patient glucose variability than the conventional group (0.9 [0.7, 1.3] mmoL.L(-1) vs 1.3 [0.8, 1.8] mmoL.L(-1), respectively; P < 0.001). Three patients had moderate hypoglycemia (intensive group), but none experienced severe episodes. CONCLUSION: Tight intraoperative glucose control in noncardiac surgery can be maintained successfully without serious hypoglycemic episodes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00433251).
机译:目的:一种安全有效的胰岛素输注算法,可在非心脏手术中实现严格的术中血糖控制,尚待正式表征和评估。因此,我们报告了DeLit Trial胰岛素输注算法的有效性。方法:计划进行非心脏大手术的患者被随机分配至术中目标血糖浓度为4.4-6.1 mmoL.L(-1)(80-110 mg.dL(-1))强化组或10-11.1 mmoL.L( -1)(180-200 mg.dL(-1))常规组。葡萄糖通过动态静脉内胰岛素输注算法进行管理。我们比较了随机分组的葡萄糖时间加权平均值(TWA),在目标内花费的时间比例,严重(<2.2 mmoL.L(-1)或<40 mg.dL(-1))或中度(< 2.8 mmoL.L(-1)或<50 mg.dL(-1))低血糖发作,患者体内葡萄糖浓度的差异表示为与患者平均值的标准偏差。结果:187例患者被分配到强化血糖控制,177例患者被分配到常规血糖控制。高强度组与常规组的术中TWA的中位数(下四分位数[Q1],上四分位数[Q3])分别为6 [5.6,6.7] mmoL.L(-1)和7.7 [6.9,9.2] mmoL.L( -1); P <0.001。高强度组在目标范围内花费了49%(29,71)的时间,比传统组在强度目标内或目标范围内所花费的时间要多得多(均P <0.001)。高强度组的患者体内葡萄糖变异性略低于常规组(分别为0.9 [0.7,1.3] mmoL.L(-1)和1.3 [0.8,1.8] mmoL.L(-1); P <0.001) 。 3名患者出现中度低血糖(重症组),但无严重发作。结论:在非心脏手术中,严格的术中血糖控制可以成功维持,而没有严重的降血糖事件。 (ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT00433251)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号