...
首页> 外文期刊>Macromolecular symposia >Comparison of Electrospinning and Gas Jet Fiber Processes for Fabrication of Bi-Component Polymer Nanofibers from Single Solutions
【24h】

Comparison of Electrospinning and Gas Jet Fiber Processes for Fabrication of Bi-Component Polymer Nanofibers from Single Solutions

机译:从单一溶液制备双组分聚合物纳米纤维的电纺和喷气纤维工艺的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this study, the rates of nanofiber production are compared between single needle electrospinning and single nozzle gas jet fiber (GJF) processes by considering bi-component nanofibers of two immiscible polymers. The spinning solutions consist of two immiscible polymers and two mutually miscible solvents. The solvent pairs with different vapor pressure are used to obtain three morphological forms - interpenetrating network (IPN), bi-lobal, and core-shell. As baseline for comparison, electrospinning conditions are chosen to produce the same equivalent liquid jet diameter as in the case of GJF process. It is observed that nanofibers of IPN, bi-lobal, and core-shell morphologies are easily produced in the GJF process at high rates while nanofibers of only the IPN and bi-lobal morphologies are produced via electrospinning, although at much lower rates. The core-shell nanofibers cannot be produced via electrospinning process for the combinations of polymers and the solvents chosen in this work.
机译:在这项研究中,通过考虑两种不混溶聚合物的双组分纳米纤维,比较了单针电纺和单喷嘴气体喷射纤维(GJF)工艺之间的纳米纤维生产率。纺丝溶液由两种不混溶的聚合物和两种互溶的溶剂组成。具有不同蒸气压的溶剂对用于获得三种形态形式-互穿网络(IPN),双叶和核-壳。作为比较的基准,选择静电纺丝条件以产生与GJF工艺相同的等效液体喷射直径。可以观察到,在GJF工艺中,可以容易地以高速率生产IPN,双叶形和核-壳形貌的纳米纤维,而通过电纺丝可以生产只有IPN和双叶形貌的纳米纤维,尽管速率要低得多。对于这项工作中选择的聚合物和溶剂的组合,不能通过静电纺丝工艺生产核-壳纳米纤维。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号