...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Perioperative antinociceptive effects of tramadol. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison with morphine.
【24h】

Perioperative antinociceptive effects of tramadol. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison with morphine.

机译:曲马多的围术期镇痛作用。与吗啡的前瞻性,随机,双盲比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of tramadol and morphine for intra- and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study 100 patients were allocated randomly into two groups. Ten minutes before induction of anaesthesia, patients in group 1 received 100 mg tramadol and those in group 2 received 10 mg morphine i.v. Anaesthesia was induced with 5 mg.kg-1 thiopental and was maintained with O2, N2O plus isoflurane with additional doses of tramadol or morphine as decided by the attending anaesthetist. Postoperatively, patients in group 1 and group 2 received tramadol and morphine, respectively, from a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Pain, analgesic consumption, vital signs and side effects were recorded postoperatively for 24 hr. RESULTS: Intraoperative consumption of tramadol and morphine were 137 +/- 37 and 12.2 +/- 3 mg, respectively. Compared with morphine, patients receiving tramadol had higher blood pressures and required greater mean ETisQ to control haemodynamic variables (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, there were no differences in observer pain score or visual analogue pain score during the first 24 hr between groups except at 30, 45, and 90 min where patients in the tramadol group reported higher pain scores (P < 0.05). The cumulative, 24 hr PCA consumption was 111 +/- 93 and 7.5 +/- 6.6 mg of tramadol and morphine, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference between the use of tramadol and morphine to treat pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy from 90 min after the end of surgery. Morphine was more effective than tramadol as an intraoperative analgesic.
机译:目的:比较曲马多和吗啡对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术中和术后镇痛的疗效。方法:在一项前瞻性,随机,双盲研究中,将100例患者随机分为两组。麻醉诱导前10分钟,第1组的患者接受100 mg曲马多,第2组的患者接受10 mg吗啡静脉注射。由主治麻醉师决定,用5 mg.kg-1的硫喷妥钠麻醉,并用O2,N2O和异氟烷以及额外剂量的曲马多或吗啡维持麻醉。术后,第1组和第2组的患者分别通过患者自控镇痛(PCA)装置接受了曲马多和吗啡。术后24小时记录疼痛,止痛药,生命体征和副作用。结果:术中曲马多和吗啡的消费量分别为137 +/- 37和12.2 +/- 3 mg。与吗啡相比,接受曲马多的患者血压更高,需要更大的平均ETisQ来控制血流动力学变量(P <0.05)。术后,除了在30、45和90分钟时曲马多组患者的疼痛评分较高(P <0.05),两组之间的前24小时观察者疼痛评分或视觉模拟疼痛评分没有差异。 24小时PCA累积累积消费量为曲马多和吗啡分别为111 +/- 93和7.5 +/- 6.6 mg。结论:从手术结束后90分钟开始,使用曲马多和吗啡治疗腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛无差异。吗啡作为术中镇痛剂比曲马多更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号