...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Lower flange modification improves performance of the Macintosh, but not the Miller laryngoscope blade.
【24h】

Lower flange modification improves performance of the Macintosh, but not the Miller laryngoscope blade.

机译:较低的法兰修改可提高Macintosh的性能,但不能提高Miller喉镜刀片的性能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: In order to minimize the potential for dental damage and to improve laryngeal visualization during tracheal intubation, two commonly used laryngoscope blades were modified and compared in a clinical setting: the Miller laryngoscope blade and the Macintosh laryngoscope blade. Modified versions of both laryngoscope blades with a lowered heel (Callander modification) at the proximal end of the blade were compared to standard blades. METHODS: Forty patients scheduled for general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation were studied prospectively. Preoperatively, the patients' airways were evaluated according to Mallampati score, thyromental distance and interincisor gap. After induction of anesthesia laryngoscopy was performed with the original laryngoscope and its modified counterpart in random order. A lateral x-ray of the neck was taken after the optimal view had been obtained, and blade-tooth distance, laryngeal view, blade-tooth contact and need for assistance were measured. Using angularcalculations the laryngoscopes were analyzed at different insertion depths on graph paper, and the results were compared with data from the lateral x-rays. RESULTS: With a modified Macintosh blade the blade-tooth distance was significantly greater in comparison to the original design (2.5 +/- 2.1 cm vs 0.2 +/- 0.1 cm, P < 0.01). Consequently the number of blade-tooth contacts was significantly lower (20% vs 75%, P < 0.05). The best laryngeal view could be obtained using a modified Macintosh laryngoscope. With a modified Miller laryngoscope laryngeal visibility was not improved and assistance was required more often to achieve adequate intubating conditions (35% vs 5%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A reduction of the proximal flange of a Miller blade decreases the blade's effectiveness for laryngeal visualization, whereas a similar modification of a Macintosh blade increases blade-tooth distance, decreases the number of blade-tooth contacts and provides a better laryngeal view.
机译:目的:为了最大程度地减少牙齿损伤的可能性并改善气管插管过程中的喉镜可视性,对两种常用的喉镜刀片进行了修改并在临床环境中进行了比较:Miller喉镜刀片和Macintosh喉镜刀片。将两个喉镜刀片的改良版本与刀片的近端放在一起,该喉镜刀片的后跟处的脚跟降低(Callander修改)。方法:前瞻性研究了40例计划行全身麻醉的需要气管插管的患者。术前根据Mallampati评分,胸膜距离和门齿间隙评估患者的气道。麻醉诱导后,使用原始喉镜及其改良的对应喉镜以随机顺序进行喉镜检查。在获得最佳视野后,对颈部进行侧向X射线拍摄,并测量刀齿距离,喉镜视野,刀齿接触和辅助需求。使用角度计算,在方格纸上不同插入深度下对喉镜进行分析,并将结果与​​侧向X射线数据进行比较。结果:与原始设计相比,使用改良的Macintosh刀片,刀片齿距明显更大(2.5 +/- 2.1 cm对0.2 +/- 0.1 cm,P <0.01)。因此,叶片齿接触的数量明显减少(20%比75%,P <0.05)。可以使用改良的Macintosh喉镜获得最佳的喉镜视图。使用改良的Miller喉镜,喉镜的可见度并没有得到改善,并且需要更多的协助才能达到足够的插管条件(35%vs 5%,P <0.05)。结论:减少米勒刀片的近端凸缘会降低刀片在喉部可视化方面的有效性,而对Macintosh刀片进行类似的修改会增加刀片与牙齿的距离,减少刀片与牙齿的接触数并提供更好的喉部视野。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号