...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Comparison between epidural infusion of fentanyl/bupivacaine and morphine/bupivacaine after orthopaedic surgery.
【24h】

Comparison between epidural infusion of fentanyl/bupivacaine and morphine/bupivacaine after orthopaedic surgery.

机译:骨科手术后硬膜外输注芬太尼/布比卡因和吗啡/布比卡因的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare epidural infusions of bupivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-morphine mixtures for postoperative pain relief after total hip replacement. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 30 ASA physical status I-II patients undergoing total hip replacement were studied. Anaesthesia was provided by combined general/epidural anaesthesia without epidural opioids. Postoperative epidural analgesia was by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% (4 ml.hr-1) with either 0.05 mg.ml-1 morphine (morphine, n = 15) or 0.005 mg.ml-1 fentanyl (fentanyl, n = 15). Visual analogue pain scale (VAS), sedation (four-point scale), respiratory rate, pulse oximetry, rescue analgesics and supplemental oxygen were recorded by a blind observer at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 hr after surgery. RESULTS: No differences in pain relief, sedation, or non-respiratory side effects were observed between the two groups. Rescue analgesics were required in three patients in the fentanyl group (20%) and in two receiving morphine (13.3%) (P:NS). Two patients in the fentanyl group and three in the morphine group required oxygen due to SpO2 < 90% (P:NS). Both opioid/bupivacaine mixtures decreased haemoglobin oxygen saturation compared with preoperative values. The mean +/- SD SpO2 values measured at 3, 6, 12 and 24 hr were 94.4 +/- 1, 92.6 +/- 0.9, 92 +/- 0.8, and 92.8 +/- 1 in the morphine group, 95.3 +/- 0.5, 95 +/- 0.5, 94.6 +/- 1.2, and 95.6 +/- 1 in the fentanyl group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine-morphine or bupivacaine-fentanyl mixtures provided similar pain relief. Patients receiving morphine showed a more marked decrease in SpO2 than those receiving fentanyl. However, the average SpO2 remained > 90% in both groups.
机译:目的:比较硬膜外输注布比卡因-芬太尼和布比卡因-吗啡混合物在全髋关节置换术后缓解疼痛的作用。方法:在一项前瞻性,随机,双盲研究中,研究了30名接受全髋关节置换术的ASA身体状况I-II患者。麻醉是通过全身/硬膜外联合麻醉而没有硬膜外阿片类药物进行的。术后硬膜外镇痛是通过连续输注0.125%布比卡因(4 ml.hr-1)和0.05 mg.ml-1吗啡(吗啡,n = 15)或0.005 mg.ml-1芬太尼(fentanyl,n = 15) 。盲人在手术后1、3、6、9、12和24小时记录视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS),镇静(四点量表),呼吸频率,脉搏血氧饱和度,急救镇痛药和补充氧气。结果:两组之间在疼痛缓解,镇静或非呼吸副作用方面没有差异。芬太尼组中的三名患者(20%)和两名接受吗啡的患者(13.3%)(P:NS)需要抢救性镇痛药。由于SpO2 <90%(P:NS),芬太尼组的两名患者和吗啡组的三名患者需要氧气。与术前相比,两种阿片/布比卡因混合物均降低了血红蛋白的氧饱和度。吗啡组在3、6、12和24小时测得的平均+/- SD SpO2值为94.4 +/- 1、92.6 +/- 0.9、92 +/- 0.8和92.8 +/- 1芬太尼基团中的-,0.5、95 +/- 0.5、94.6 +/- 1.2和95.6 +/- 1(P <0.05)。结论:持续硬膜外输注布比卡因-吗啡或布比卡因-芬太尼混合物可缓解类似的疼痛。与接受芬太尼的患者相比,接受吗啡的患者的SpO2降低更为明显。但是,两组的平均SpO2保持> 90%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号