...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Neuromuscular blocking effects of rocuronium during desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane anaesthesia.
【24h】

Neuromuscular blocking effects of rocuronium during desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane anaesthesia.

机译:罗库溴铵在地氟醚,异氟烷和七氟醚麻醉期间的神经肌肉阻滞作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To determine the magnitude of the potentiation of rocuronium by desflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane 1.5 MAC anaesthesia. METHODS: In a prospective, randomised, study in 80 patients, the cumulative dose-effect curves for rocuronium were determined during anaesthesia with desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane (with N2O 70%, 15 min steady state) or total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) using propofol/fentanyl. Neuromuscular block was assessed by acceleromyography (TOF-Guard) after train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve (2 Hz every 12 sec, 200 microseconds duration). Rocuronium was administered in increments of 100 micrograms.kg-1 until first twitch (T1) depression > 95%. RESULTS: Rocuronium led to more pronounced T1 depression with desflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia than with TIVA. The ED50 and ED95 were lower during desflurane (95 +/- 25 and 190 +/- 80 micrograms.kg-1) and sevoflurane (120 +/- 30 and 210 +/- 40 micrograms.kg-1) than with TIVA (150 +/- 40 and 310 +/- 90 micrograms.kg-1) (P < .01), while the difference was not significant for isoflurane (130 +/- 40 and 250 +/- 90 micrograms.kg-1). Following equi-effective dosing (T1 > 95%) the duration to 25% T1 recovery, recovery index (25/75), and TOF0.70 was: 13.2 +/- 1.8, 12.7 +/- 3.4, and 26.9 +/- 5.7 min during anaesthesia with desflurane; 15.5 +/- 5.0, 11.4 +/- 3.8, and 31.0 +/- 6.0 min with sevoflurane; 13.9 +/- 4.7, 10.7 +/- 3.3, and 26.3 +/- 8.9 min with isoflurane; and 13.9 +/- 3.9, 11.3 +/- 5.7, and 27.5 +/- 8.2 min with TIVA anaesthesia (P: NS). CONCLUSION: Interaction of rocuronium and volatile anaesthetics resulted in augmentation of the intensity of neuromuscular block but did not result in significant effects on duration of or recovery from the block.
机译:目的:确定地氟醚,异氟烷和七氟醚1.5 MAC麻醉对罗库溴铵增效作用的程度。方法:在一项前瞻性随机研究中,对80例患者进行了测定,在使用去氟醚,七氟醚和异氟烷(N2O为70%,稳定状态为15分钟)或全静脉麻醉(TIVA)麻醉期间,测定了罗库溴铵的累积剂量效应曲线。异丙酚/芬太尼。四尺(TOF)刺激尺神经(每12秒2 Hz,持续200微秒)后,通过加速肌电图(TOF-Guard)评估神经肌肉阻滞。罗库溴铵以100微克kg-1的增量给药,直到第一次抽搐(T1)抑郁> 95%为止。结果:与TIVA相比,地氟醚或七氟醚麻醉导致罗库溴铵导致的T1抑郁更为明显。地氟醚(95 +/- 25和190 +/- 80微克.kg-1)和七氟醚(120 +/- 30和210 +/- 40微克.kg-1)期间的ED50和ED95低于TIVA( 150 +/- 40和310 +/- 90微克kg-1)(P <.01),而异氟烷的差异不明显(130 +/- 40和250 +/- 90微克kg-1)。 。在进行等效有效剂量(T1> 95%)后,达到25%T1恢复,恢复指数(25/75)和TOF0.70的持续时间为:13.2 +/- 1.8、12.7 +/- 3.4和26.9 +/-地氟烷麻醉期间5.7分钟;使用七氟醚时为15.5 +/- 5.0、11.4 +/- 3.8和31.0 +/- 6.0分钟;用异氟烷13.9 +/- 4.7、10.7 +/- 3.3和26.3 +/- 8.9分钟;并在TIVA麻醉下13.9 +/- 3.9、11.3 +/- 5.7和27.5 +/- 8.2分钟(P:NS)。结论:罗库溴铵和挥发性麻醉剂的相互作用导致神经肌肉阻滞强度的增加,但对阻滞的持续时间或恢复没有明显影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号