首页> 外文期刊>Functional Ecology >Leaf shape and venation pattern alter the support investments within leaf lamina in temperate species: a neglected source of leaf physiological differentiation?
【24h】

Leaf shape and venation pattern alter the support investments within leaf lamina in temperate species: a neglected source of leaf physiological differentiation?

机译:叶片的形状和通气方式改变了温带物种叶片中的叶片支持性投资:叶片生理分化的被忽视来源?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A trade-off between the investments in functional and support structures is a major determinant of leaf physiological activities. A variety of leaf shapes and venation densities occur in coexisting vegetation, but the costs and benefits of various leaf shapes and venation architectures are poorly understood. As the lever arms (location of leaf mass centre) become effectively longer as the maximum of lamina mass distribution shifts farther from the lamina base, we hypothesized that the fraction of lamina biomass in the mid-rib (FMR) is larger in leaves in which the centroid of lamina mass is located at, or greater than, half-leaf length ('elliptic' leaves) compared with leaves having the centroid of lamina mass located closer to the leaf base ('ovate' leaves). We further hypothesized that minor vein density ( rho V) is larger in leaves with lower FMR, compensating for lower investments in central support. Finally, we predicted that rho V is lower in parallel/palmate-veined than in pinnate-veined leaves, due to a more uniform distribution of large veins in parallel/palmate-veined leaves. FMR and rho V were studied in 44 herbs and woody seedlings with an overall variation in lamina fresh mass (MFL) of more than five orders of magnitude, and a sixfold variation in leaf longevity. Species were separated between pinnate-veined elliptic and ovate leaves, and parallel- or palmate-veined elliptic and ovate leaves. The study was conducted at the end of June 2000 in Estonia. Species were selected for the study to achieve a representative range of leaves with different size, shape and venation. Of the 44 species sampled, 33 were simple-leaved and 11 were compound-leaved. Contrary to the hypothesis, support investment in the mid-rib was similar among leaf shapes, and scaled positively with leaf size and negatively with leaf longevity. However, FMR and rho V were negatively associated. Fractional biomass investment in the mid-rib scaled with lamina size (fresh and dry mass and area), but at a common lamina size FMR was larger in pinnate-veined elliptic than in parallel/palmate-veined elliptic leaves. In addition, rho V was larger in pinnate than in parallel/palmate-veined leaves, and the differences in lamina carbon content further suggested an overall greater investment of lamina biomass in the minor veins of pinnate-veined leaves. These data demonstrate that the effect of leaf shape on biomass investments in central support is less significant than predicted by biomechanical models, partly because of the trade-off between the biomass investments in central support and minor veins, which compensate for differences in lamina shape. These data collectively indicate that leaf size, longevity, shape and venation pattern can importantly modify the distribution of foliage biomass between support and functional tissues, and thus can alter foliage physiological activity and leaf functioning in environments with different resource availability..
机译:在功能和支持结构上进行投资之间的权衡是决定叶片生理活动的主要因素。在共存的植被中会出现各种叶片形状和脉管密度,但是人们对各种叶片形状和脉管结构的成本和收益了解得很少。随着杆臂(叶片质量中心的位置)随着叶片质量分布的最大值从叶片基部向远处移动而变得更长,我们假设中肋(FMR)中叶片生物量的比例在叶片中较大。与叶片质量的质心更靠近叶基(卵形叶)的叶片相比,叶片质量的质心位于或大于半叶长度(“椭圆形”叶)。我们进一步假设FMR较低的叶片中较小的静脉密度(rho V)较大,这补偿了对中央支持的较低投资。最后,我们预测,由于平行/棕榈脉叶片中大静脉的分布更加均匀,平行/棕榈脉中的rho V低于羽状脉。在44种草药和木本植物幼苗中研究了FMR和rho V,其叶片新鲜质量(MFL)的总体变化超过五个数量级,叶片寿命变化了六倍。物种被分成羽状脉状的椭圆形和卵形叶,以及平行或掌状脉状的椭圆形和卵形叶。该研究于2000年6月底在爱沙尼亚进行。选择物种进行研究,以获得具有不同大小,形状和脉络的代表性叶片。在采样的44种中,有33种为单叶的,有11种为复叶的。与该假设相反,叶片形状在中肋骨上的支持投资相似,并且随着叶片尺寸的增加而增加,随着叶片寿命的增加而减少。但是,FMR和rho V呈负相关。中肋骨的分数生物量投资与叶片大小(新鲜,干燥的质量和面积)成比例,但在相同的叶片大小下,羽状脉状椭圆形的FMR大于平行/掌状脉状椭圆形的叶片。另外,在羽状叶中,rho V比平行/棕榈脉中的叶大,叶片碳含量的差异进一步表明在羽状叶的次要叶中叶片生物量的总体投资更大。这些数据表明,叶片形状对中枢支撑物的生物量投资的影响不如生物力学模型所预测的重要,部分原因是中枢支撑物的生物量投资与次要脉管之间的权衡,可以补偿叶片形状的差异。这些数据共同表明,叶片大小,寿命,形状和脉络模式可以重要地改变支撑和功能组织之间叶片生物量的分布,从而可以改变具有不同资源可用性的环境中叶片的生理活性和叶片功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号