...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Surgical safety checklist: Implementation in an ambulatory surgical facility
【24h】

Surgical safety checklist: Implementation in an ambulatory surgical facility

机译:手术安全性清单:在非卧床手术设施中的实施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: In 2007, the World Health Organization created a Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) that encompassed a simple set of surgical safety standards. The threefold purpose of this study was to add ambulatory-specific items to the SSC, to introduce the items into an ambulatory surgical facility, and to determine if patient outcomes regarding postoperative pain and nausea/vomiting improved following implementation. In addition, safety attitudes, antibiotic timing, regional anesthesiaerve blocks, preemptive pain medications, prophylactic antiemetics, length of stay, and hospital admission were also assessed. Methods: After Research Ethics Board approval, staff complete a Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. Seven items were added to the SSC. Data were then collected on 180 surgical cases before SSC implementation and 195 cases following implementation. Compliance with each section of the SSC was assessed. Results: On postoperative day one, the median (97.5% confidence interval [CI]) difference between pre- and post-implementation pain scores was 0.5 (97.5% CI, 0 to 1; P = 0.13), and the median difference in the rate of post-discharge nausea/vomiting was -8.4% (97.5% CI, -17.9 to 1.1; P = 0.06). There was no improvement in safety attitudes or any of the secondary outcomes, with the exception of the use of preemptive pain medications. Compliance with the three sections of the checklist, i.e., BRIEFING, TIME OUT, and DEBRIEFING was 99.49%, 97.95%, and 96.92%, respectively. There was low compliance in verbalization of the added "ambulatory-specific items". Conclusion: Potential reasons for lack of uptake and integration include poor "user" buy-in, an overly lengthy checklist, and lack of prioritization of ambulatory-specific items. A shortened SSC was developed based on the results of this study. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00934310.
机译:目的:2007年,世界卫生组织(WHO)制定了一份外科手术安全检查表(SSC),其中包括一组简单的手术安全标准。这项研究的三重目的是在SSC中增加非卧床专用物品,将其引入非卧床手术设备,并确定实施后患者有关术后疼痛和恶心/呕吐的预后是否改善。此外,还评估了安全态度,抗生素时机,局部麻醉/神经阻滞,先发性止痛药,预防性止吐药,住院时间和入院时间。方法:经研究道德委员会批准,工作人员完成《安全态度问卷》。 SSC中添加了七个项目。然后在实施SSC之前收集了180例外科手术病例的数据,在实施之后收集了195例病例的数据。评估了SSC各部分的合规性。结果:术后第一天,实施前后疼痛评分的中位数(97.5%置信区间[CI])差异为0.5(97.5%CI,0至1; P = 0.13),而中位数差异出院后恶心/呕吐的发生率为-8.4%(CI为97.5%,-17.9至1.1; P = 0.06)。除使用先发性止痛药外,安全态度或任何次要结果均无改善。遵守清单的三个部分的情况分别为:简报,超时和删除(DEBRIEFING)分别为99.49%,97.95%和96.92%。所添加的“非流动性项目”的口头表达水平较低。结论:缺乏吸收和整合的潜在原因包括不良的“用户”购买,冗长的清单以及对非流动性物品的优先排序。根据这项研究的结果,缩短了SSC。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT00934310上注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号