...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >The impact of postoperative intensive care on outcomes in elective neurosurgical patients in good physical condition: a single centre propensity case-matched study.
【24h】

The impact of postoperative intensive care on outcomes in elective neurosurgical patients in good physical condition: a single centre propensity case-matched study.

机译:术后重症监护对身体状况良好的择期神经外科患者结局的影响:一项单中心倾向病例配对研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: In the last three years, all elective neurosurgical cases were performed by a single surgeon at Nara Medical University. For the last year and a half, all patients were transferred to a newly created neurosurgical intensive care unit. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of admission to an intensive care unit after elective neurosurgery. METHODS: This study was conducted as a retrospective clinical chart review. Institutional ethics approval was waived, and we reviewed the charts of 296 neurosurgical patients who were American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status I-II. To avoid channelling bias, propensity score analysis was used to generate a set of matched cases (patients transferred to the intensive care unit [ICU]) and controls (patients transferred to the neurosurgical ward). This process resulted in 104 matched pairs of elective surgical patients who did or did not have an ICU admission after surgery. Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) at discharge or at three months after the operation was compared as the primary outcome measure. As secondary outcome measures, we also compared rates of severe early complications and patient satisfaction regarding perioperative patient care. RESULTS: With an unmatched population, poor GOS tended to occur more often in the non-ICU group than in the ICU group (6.5% vs 2.3%, respectively). Mortality rates and severe early complication rates also tended to be higher in the non-ICU group than in the ICU group (2.4% and 5.3%, respectively, non-ICU group vs 0.8% and 2.3%, respectively, ICU group). However, after propensity score matching, there was no difference regarding the GOS between groups. Both groups showed very high good outcome percentages (98.1% ICU vs 97.1% non-ICU). With regard to mortality rates and severe early complications, both groups showed low mortality (0.96% vs 0.96%) and complication rates (2.89% ICU vs 3.85% non-ICU). Patient care in the ICU failed to increase patient satisfaction regarding the overall hospital care. CONCLUSION: The results of this analysis suggest that admission to an ICU after elective neurosurgery has little impact on outcomes.
机译:目的:在过去三年中,所有的选择性神经外科手术病例都是由奈良医科大学的一名外科医生进行的。在过去的一年半中,所有患者均被转移到新成立的神经外科重症监护室。这项研究的目的是评估选择性神经外科手术后进入重症监护室的影响。方法:本研究作为回顾性临床图表审查进行。放弃了机构伦理学的批准,我们复查了296位神经外科患者的病历,这些患者是美国麻醉医师协会I-II的身体状况。为了避免渠道偏差,倾向评分分析用于生成一组匹配的病例(将患者转移到重症监护病房[ICU])和对照(将患者转移到神经外科病房)。此过程导致104对配对的择期手术患者在手术后接受或未接受ICU。比较出院时或手术后三个月的格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)作为主要结局指标。作为次要结局指标,我们还比较了围手术期患者护理的严重早期并发症发生率和患者满意度。结果:在无匹配人群的情况下,非ICU组比ICU组更容易发生不良GOS(分别为6.5%和2.3%)。非ICU组的死亡率和严重的早期并发症发生率也往往高于ICU组(非ICU组分别为2.4%和5.3%,ICU组分别为0.8%和2.3%)。但是,倾向得分匹配后,各组之间的GOS没有差异。两组均显示出很高的良好结局百分比(ICU为98.1%,非ICU为97.1%)。关于死亡率和严重的早期并发症,两组均显示出低死亡率(0.96%比0.96%)和并发症发生率(2.89%ICU比3.85%非ICU)。 ICU的患者护理未能提高患者对整体医院护理的满意度。结论:该分析结果表明选择性神经外科手术后入ICU对预后影响不大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号