...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Best evidence in critical care medicine: treatment for hyperglycemia in the intensive care unit: a 'bittersweet' message.
【24h】

Best evidence in critical care medicine: treatment for hyperglycemia in the intensive care unit: a 'bittersweet' message.

机译:重症监护医学的最佳证据:重症监护病房的高血糖治疗:“苦乐参半”的信息。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance are common in severe illness and are associated with a worse outcome. In 2001, a randomized, single-centre, prospective unblinded trial of surgical patients compared intensive-glycemic control (serum glucose 4.4-6.1 mmol centre L~(-1)) with more liberal glucose management (serum glucose 10-12 mmol centre L~(-1)). Significant decreases in mortality and morbidity were observed in the intensively treated group. In addition, a pronounced mortality benefit was demonstrated for patients who required intensive care unit (ICU) therapy for three or more days. It was unresolved as to whether or not these benefits may apply to medical ICU patients. This study was undertaken to address these issues.Question: Does intensive insulin treatment decrease mortality amongst medical ICU patients?Design: Single centre, prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing conventional insulin therapy to intensive insulin therapy in medical ICU patients expected to stay in ICU for three or more days. The study was conducted between 2002 and 2005.Patients: One thousand two-hundred patients admitted to a medical ICU in Leuven, Belgium and, for whom the anticipated length was > three days, were enrolled. Postoperative surgical patients and those with do-not-resuscitate orders were excluded. Of patients enrolled, 767 remained in ICU for at least three days. The investigation was powered to detect a difference of 7% in outcome (based upon the investigators' previous results in surgical ICU patients). The two groups were similar in all respects, apart from their baseline Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28 (TISS-28) scores, which were higher in the treatment group.
机译:背景:高血糖和胰岛素抵抗在重症患者中很常见,并伴有不良后果。 2001年,一项针对手术患者的随机,单中心,前瞻性,无盲试验将高血糖控制(血清葡萄糖4.4-6.1 mmol中心L〜(-1))与更宽松的血糖管理(血清葡萄糖10-12 mmol中心L)进行了比较〜(-1))。在强化治疗组中观察到死亡率和发病率显着降低。此外,对于需要重症监护病房(ICU)治疗三天或更长时间的患者,已证明具有明显的死亡率优势。这些益处是否可能适用于医疗ICU患者,尚无定论。本研究旨在解决这些问题。问题:强化胰岛素治疗是否可降低ICU医疗患者的死亡率?设计:单中心,前瞻性,非盲,随机对照试验,将常规胰岛素治疗与强化胰岛素治疗在ICU医疗患者中进行比较在ICU停留三天或更长时间。该研究于2002年至2005年进行。患者:招募了比利时鲁汶的ICU收治的120例患者,其预期病程> 3天。排除了术后外科手术患者和那些不进行复苏的患者。在入组患者中,有767名患者留在ICU中至少三天。这项调查能够检测出7%的结果差异(基于研究者先前在外科ICU患者中的结果)。两组在所有方面都相似,除了其基线治疗干预评分系统-28(TISS-28)得分外,在治疗组中更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号