首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology >Effects of Eradicating Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Patients With Cirrhosis Differ With Stage of Portal Hypertension
【24h】

Effects of Eradicating Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Patients With Cirrhosis Differ With Stage of Portal Hypertension

机译:根治性肝硬化合并门静脉高压症患者的根除丙型肝炎病毒感染的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) via antiviral treatment changes the course of liver disease. We evaluated the benefit of sustained virologic response (SVR) in patients with HCV and cirrhosis without (stage 1) and with (stage 2) esophageal varices (EV). METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of 444 patients with HCV and compensated cirrhosis (218 with stage 1 and 226 with stage 2 disease) treated with peg-interferon and ribavirin from June 2001 through December 2009 at the University of Palermo, Italy and followed for a median of 7.6 years (range, 1-12.6 years). We used Cox regression analysis to identify variables associated with appearance or progression of EVs, development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver decompensation, and overall survival. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, 67 patients with stage 1 disease (30.7%) and 41 patients with stage 2 disease (18.1%) achieved an SVR (P = .003). Patients with stage 1 disease and an SVR were less likely to develop EVs than stage 1 patients without an SVR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.48; P < .001). However, SVR did not affect whether patients with stage 2 disease developed further EVs (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.33-1.03; P = .07, by log-rank test). An SVR was associated with lower risk for HCC (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.55; P <. 001). Patients with stage 2 disease, regardless of SVR, were at greater risk than patients with stage 1 disease for liver decompensation (HR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.73-4.59; P < .001) or death (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.12-2.80; P = .015). A lower proportion of patients with stage 1 disease and an SVR died from HCC (2.9%), compared with those without an SVR (11.9%) (P = .03) or developed liver decompensation (none vs 7.1% without an SVR; P = .009). A lower proportion of patients with stage 2 disease and an SVR died from causes secondary to HCC (2.0%) compared with those without an SVR (18.4%) (P = .003). Death from causes secondary to liver decompensation did not differ significantly between patients with stage 2 disease with or without an SVR (12.1% vs 25.4%; P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study of 444 patients with HCV and compensated cirrhosis, HCV eradication reduced risk for liver decompensation, HCC, and death, regardless of whether the patients had EVs.
机译:背景与目的:通过抗病毒治疗清除丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)会改变肝脏疾病的进程。我们评估了无(1期)和(2期)食管静脉曲张(EV)的HCV和肝硬化患者的持续病毒学应答(SVR)的益处。方法:我们从2001年6月至2009年12月在意大利巴勒莫大学对444例HCV并代偿性肝硬化患者进行了前瞻性队列研究,其中peg-干扰素和利巴韦林治疗了肝硬化(1期218例,2期226例),随后中位数为7.6年(范围为1-12.6年)。我们使用Cox回归分析来确定与EV的出现或进展,肝细胞癌(HCC)的发生,肝脏代偿失调和总体生存率相关的变量。结果:在意向治疗分析中,67例1期疾病患者(30.7%)和41例2期疾病患者(18.1%)达到了SVR(P = .003)。与没有SVR的1期患者相比,有1期疾病和SVR的患者发生EV的可能性较小(危险比[HR]为0.23; 95%置信区间[CI]为0.11-0.48; P <.001)。然而,SVR不会影响2期疾病患者是否进一步发展电动汽车(HR,1.58; 95%CI,0.33-1.03; P = 0.07,通过对数秩检验)。 SVR与较低的HCC风险相关(HR,0.25; 95%CI,0.12-0.55; P <.001)。无论SVR为何,患有2期疾病的患者发生肝代偿失调(HR,2.82; 95%CI,1.73-4.59; P <.001)或死亡(HR,1.77; 95%)的风险均高于患有1期疾病的患者。 CI,1.12-2.80; P = .015)。与没有SVR的患者(11.9%)(P = .03)或发生肝代偿失调的患者相比,患有1期疾病和SVR的患者死于肝癌(2.9%)的比例较低(无vs.没有SVR的7.1%; P = .009)。与没有SVR的患者(18.4%)相比,患有2期疾病和SVR的患者死于HCC继发性原因(2.0%)(P = .003)。在有或没有SVR的2期疾病患者中,由于肝失代偿所致的原因死亡没有显着差异(12.1%vs 25.4%; P = .15)。结论:在一项对444例HCV和代偿性肝硬化患者的前瞻性研究中,根除HCV可以降低肝脏代偿失调,HCC和死亡的风险,无论患者是否有EV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号