首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology >Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin is more effective than peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for treating chronic hepatitis C virus infection.
【24h】

Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin is more effective than peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for treating chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

机译:聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a加利巴韦林比聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b加利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染更有效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are frequently treated with a combination of pegylated interferon (peginterferon) and ribavirin. This study compared the efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2a and peginterferon alfa-2b, each in combination with ribavirin. METHODS: A total of 320 consecutive, treatment-naive, HCV RNA-positive patients with chronic hepatitis were randomly assigned to once-weekly peginterferon alfa-2a (180 microg, group A) or peginterferon alfa-2b (1.5 microg/kg, group B) plus ribavirin 1000 mg/day (body weight <75 kg) or 1200 mg/day (body weight >or=75 kg) for 48 weeks (genotype 1 or 4) or 24 weeks (genotype 2 or 3). The primary end point was sustained virological response (SVR) by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: More patients in group A than group B achieved an SVR (110/160 [68.8%] vs 87/160 [54.4%]; P = .008). Higher SVR rates were obtained in group A than group B among patients with genotype 1/4 (51/93 [54.8%] vs 37/93 [39.8%]; P = .04), with genotype 2/3 (59/67 [88.1%] vs 50/67 [74.6%]; P = .046), without cirrhosis (96/127 [75.6%] vs 75/134 [55.9%]; P = .005), and with baseline levels HCV RNA >500,000 IU/mL (58/84 [69%] vs 43/93 [46.2%]; P = .002). SVR rates in groups A and B were not statistically different among patients with baseline HCV RNA
机译:背景与目的:慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染患者经常使用聚乙二醇化干扰素(peginterferon)和利巴韦林联合治疗。这项研究比较了聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a和聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b分别与利巴韦林联用的疗效和安全性。方法:将总共320例连续的,未经治疗的HCV RNA阳性慢性肝炎患者随机分配至每周一次的peginterferon alfa-2a(180μg,A组)或peginterferon alfa-2b(1.5 microg / kg,组) B)加利巴韦林1000毫克/天(体重<75千克)或1200毫克/天(体重>或= 75千克)48周(基因型1或4)或24周(基因型2或3)。主要终点是通过意向性治疗持续的病毒学应答(SVR)。结果:A组患者获得SVR的比例高于B组(110/160 [68.8%] vs 87/160 [54.4%]; P = .008)。基因型为2/3(59/67)的基因型1/4的患者中,A组的SVR率高于B组(51/93 [54.8%] vs 37/93 [39.8%]; P = .04) [88.1%]与50/67 [74.6%]; P = .046),无肝硬化(96/127 [75.6%]与75/134 [55.9%]; P = .005),且基线水平为HCV RNA > 500,000 IU / mL(58/84 [69%]对43/93 [46.2%]; P = .002)。在基线HCV RNA <或= 500,000 IU / mL的患者中,A和B组的SVR率无统计学差异(52/76 [68.4%] vs 44/67 [65.7%]; P = .727)肝硬化(14/33 [42.4%]对12/26 [46.1%]; P = .774)。结论:在慢性HCV感染患者中,聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a加利巴韦林产生的SVR率明显高于聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b加利巴韦林。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号