首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique >Contribution of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the workup of mediastinal lymph nodes
【24h】

Contribution of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the workup of mediastinal lymph nodes

机译:内镜超声引导下细针穿刺对纵隔淋巴结检查的贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and aim: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), a minimally invasive technique, to determine its diagnostic accuracy and morbidity in the etiological diagnoses of mediastinal lymph nodes. Methods: A total of 84 patients underwent EUS-FNA biopsy of the mediastinal lymph nodes, and were classified as either malignant disease, inflammatory disease or incidental diagnosis, according to the suspected clinical condition. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA in each group, a comparison of the cytological results obtained with 19- and 22-gauge needles was performed. Results: All 84 procedures were carried out between January 2004 and June 2008. Six patients were excluded because of non-contributory results. On analyzing the results of EUS-FNA in the malignant group (n = 41), the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 93, 100, 100 and 85%, respectively. In the inflammatory (n = 20) and incidental diagnosis (n = 17) groups, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 85, 100, 100 and 75%, and 80, 100, 100 and 77%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the FNA results with the 19-gauge (20/78 patients) versus 22-gauge (58/78 patients) needles (P = 0.55). Also, no complications were reported either during the procedure or after the 6-month follow-up. Conclusion: EUS-FNA is a safe and accurate diagnostic procedure for the study of mediastinal lymph nodes not only for malignancy, but also for inflammatory diseases and incidental diagnoses. In addition, there is no difference in diagnostic accuracy whether FNA is carried out with a 19-gauge or 22-gauge needle.
机译:背景与目的:这项回顾性研究的目的是评估内镜超声引导下的细针穿刺抽吸术(EUS-FNA)(一种微创技术),以确定其在纵隔淋巴结病因诊断中的诊断准确性和发病率。方法:共有84例患者接受了纵隔淋巴结的EUS-FNA活检,并根据可疑的临床状况分为恶性疾病,炎性疾病或偶然诊断。为了评估每组EUS-FNA的诊断准确性,对使用19号和22号针头获得的细胞学结果进行了比较。结果:全部84例手术均在2004年1月至2008年6月之间进行。由于无贡献,将6例患者排除在外。分析恶性组(n = 41)的EUS-FNA结果,敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为93%,100%,100%和85%。在炎症组(n = 20)和偶然诊断组(n = 17)中,敏感性,特异性,PPV和NPV分别为85%,100%,100%和75%,以及80%,100%,100%和77%。 19针(20/78例)的FNA结果与22针(58/78例)的FNA结果之间无显着差异(P = 0.55)。此外,在手术过程中或6个月的随访后均未报告并发症。结论:EUS-FNA是一种安全,准确的诊断方法,不仅可用于研究纵隔淋巴结的恶性程度,还可用于炎性疾病和偶然诊断。此外,使用19号或22号针头进行FNA的诊断准确性没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号