首页> 外文期刊>Fisheries Research >Influence of model misspecification, temporal changes, and data weighting in stock assessment models: Application to swordfish (Xiphias gladius) in the Indian Ocean
【24h】

Influence of model misspecification, temporal changes, and data weighting in stock assessment models: Application to swordfish (Xiphias gladius) in the Indian Ocean

机译:模型错误指定,时间变化和数据权重在种群评估模型中的影响:在印度洋箭鱼(Xiphias gladius)中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Results from stock assessment modelling are often highly sensitive to model assumptions. It is therefore important that models are correctly specified and sensitivity analyses are conducted to evaluate the impact of model uncertainty. Model misspecification, changes in parameters overtime, and data weighting are common issues that arise when developing stock assessment models. We conducted a stock assessment for swordfish Xiphias gladius in the Indian Ocean, using an integrated age-structured model, and evaluated estimates of management quantities under alternative assumptions about (1) changes in catchability for CPUE-based indices of abundance, (2) changes in gear selectivity, (3) weighting of abundance indices, and (4) the impact of sex-specific growth. The results indicated that assuming time-blocks for both catchability and selectivity may be appropriate to reflect the changes in fishing operations of Japanese and Taiwanese longline fleets. This assumption also provided better model performance and more optimistic assessment results because it implied that the decline in indices of abundance resulted from changes in catchability rather than depletion of biomass. Inappropriate choices for selectivity curves can deleteriously affect model performance, and attempting to account for model misspecification through downweighting of data may not be appropriate. Care must be taken when modelling changes in selectivity because selectivity can be distorted to accommodate changes in catchability. More generally, substantial changes in catchability (e.g., due to changes in targeting) may not be fully addressed in CPUE standardization and may require modelling changes over time in catchability within the stock assessment model. Finally, we found that misspecification of growth is at least as influential, if not more so, than misspecification of catchability and selectivity, or data weighting. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:库存评估建模的结果通常对模型假设高度敏感。因此,正确指定模型并进行敏感性分析以评估模型不确定性的影响非常重要。在开发库存评估模型时,模型规格不正确,参数超时变化和数据权重是常见问题。我们使用集成的年龄结构模型对印度洋的剑鱼剑嘴鱼进行了种群评估,并根据以下替代假设评估了管理量的估计值:(1)基于CPUE的丰度指数的可捕获性变化,(2)变化在齿轮选择性方面,(3)丰度指数的权重,以及(4)特定性别增长的影响。结果表明,假设在可捕获性和选择性上都设置了时间段可能适合反映日本和台湾延绳钓船队捕捞活动的变化。该假设还提供了更好的模型性能和更乐观的评估结果,因为它暗示丰度指数的下降是由于可捕获性的变化而不是生物量的减少所致。选择性曲线的选择不当会有害地影响模型性能,并且尝试通过降低数据权重来解决模型指定不正确的问题。对选择性变化进行建模时必须小心,因为选择性可能会扭曲以适应可捕获性的变化。更一般而言,CPUE标准化可能无法完全解决可捕获性的重大变化(例如,由于目标变更),并且可能需要在库存评估模型中对可捕获性随时间的变化进行建模。最后,我们发现增长的错误指定至少与可捕获性和选择性的错误指定或数据权重一样有影响,甚至影响更大。 (C)2014 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号