首页> 外文期刊>Fisheries Research >Effects of hook and bait in a tropical northeast Atlantic pelagic longline fishery: Part I-Incidental sea turtle bycatch
【24h】

Effects of hook and bait in a tropical northeast Atlantic pelagic longline fishery: Part I-Incidental sea turtle bycatch

机译:钩和饵在东北大西洋中上层延绳钓渔业中的影响:第一部分-偶然的海龟兼捕

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The interaction between tuna fisheries and sea turtles is commonly recognized as one of the major threats and causes for the decline of sea turtle populations. Within the tuna and swordfish fisheries, the incidental sea turtle bycatch is usually more frequent from longline fisheries targeting swordfish. Therefore it is important to test possible mitigation measures, particularly in areas where fishing activities and high abundance of these species overlaps, as is the case of the Tropical Northeast Atlantic Ocean. Between August 2008 and December 2011, a total of 202 experimental pelagic longline sets were carried out in that region (latitude: 11-22 degrees N, longitude: 20-38 degrees W). The aim was to test the effects of changing the traditional J-style hooks (10 degrees offset) baited with squid used by the fishing industry, against two circle hooks (one non-offset and one with 100 offset) and mackerel bait. Four sea turtle species were captured, with the leatherback Dermochelys coriacea comprising most of the bycatches (BPUE, bycatch per unit of effort using the traditional configuration of 0.990 turtles/1000 hooks), followed by three hardshell species: the loggerhead Caretta caretta and the olive ridley Lepidochelys olivacea (BPUE = 0.165 turtles/1000 hooks), and the Kemp ridley Lepidochelys kempii (BPUE = 0.024 turtles/1000 hooks). In general, the sea turtle interactions in the fishery can be reduced by changing from the traditional gear to one of the experimental combinations. However, those reductions were species-specific, with the leatherback bycatches reduced only when changing from J-style to the non-offset circle hook, while for the hardshell turtles both the hook style (using a circle hook, with or without offset) and the bait (using mackerel) significantly reduced the incidental bycatches. Hooking location was also species-specific, with most hardshell specimens hooked by the mouth and esophagus, while leatherbacks were mostly hooked externally by the flippers. Most of the sea turtles were captured and released alive with the mortality rates independent of the hook style and bait type used. A reduction of 55% in leatherback incidental bycatches can be expected in this fishery by changing from J-style to circle hooks, whereas for the hardshell species a 50-59% reduction can be obtained by changing to circle hooks (respectively with and without offset), and a 55% reduction by using mackerel bait. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:金枪鱼渔业与海龟之间的相互作用通常被认为是造成海龟种群减少的主要威胁之一和原因。在金枪鱼和箭鱼渔业中,针对箭鱼的延绳钓渔业通常会附带捕捞海龟。因此,重要的是测试可能的缓解措施,尤其是在捕捞活动和这些物种的丰富度重叠的地区,例如热带东北大西洋。在2008年8月至2011年12月之间,该地区共进行了202次实验性远洋延绳钓集(纬度:北纬11-22度,经度:西纬20-38度)。目的是测试将传统的J型钩(偏移10度)用捕鱼业使用的鱿鱼诱饵相对于两个圆形钩(一个不偏移,另一个偏移100度)和鲭鱼饵的效果。捕获了四种海龟物种,其中棱皮背皮D科动物大部分捕获(BPUE,使用传统构造的0.990只海龟/ 1000个钩子,每单位工作量的兼捕物),其次是三种硬壳物种:头Car鱼和橄榄。 ridley Lepidochelys olivacea(BPUE = 0.165龟/ 1000钩)和Kemp ridley Lepidochelys kempii(BPUE = 0.024龟/ 1000钩)。通常,通过将传统渔具更改为实验组合之一,可以减少渔业中的海龟相互作用。但是,这些减少是特定于物种的,仅当从J样式更改为非偏移圆钩时,棱皮by的捕捞才会减少,而对于硬壳海龟,则同时使用钩样式(使用或不使用偏移的圆钩)和诱饵(使用鲭鱼)可显着减少附带捕捞。钩的位置也是特定于物种的,大多数硬壳标本都通过嘴和食道钩住,而棱皮背大多数都被鳍状钩钩在外部。大多数海龟被捕获并活着释放,其死亡率与所用的鱼钩类型和诱饵类型无关。从J型改为圆形钩,预计该渔业的棱皮附带捕捞量减少55%,而对于硬壳种类,改为圆形钩则可以减少50-59%(分别有和没有偏移量)。 ),并使用鲭鱼诱饵将其减少55%。 (C)2014 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号