首页> 外文期刊>Fisheries Management and Ecology >Comparing the utility of fishery-independent and fishery-dependent methods in assessing the relative abundance of estuarine fish species in partial protection areas
【24h】

Comparing the utility of fishery-independent and fishery-dependent methods in assessing the relative abundance of estuarine fish species in partial protection areas

机译:比较渔业独立和渔业依赖方法在评估部分保护区河口鱼类相对丰富度方面的效用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In partial protection management areas such as Recreational Fishing Havens (RFHs) where commercial fishing is prohibited there are fewer sampling methods available for quantifying the relative abundance of species. Consequently, a framework is needed in such areas to decide whether sampling should be based on: (1) fishery-independent techniques; (2) fishery-dependent methods that rely on recreational fishery harvests; or (3) a combination of the two. This study compared fishery-independent data derived from baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) and independent fishing surveys (IFS) with fishery-dependent data based on recreational angler surveys (AS) to identify the fish species that were best enumerated by each method in two Australian RFHs. Each method captured/detected disparate species and each consistently showed correlations with the relative abundance of particular suites of species. The species that were correlated with and best enumerated by BRUVS were Microcanthus strigatus (Cuvier) and Pelates sexlineatus (Qouy & Gaimard); those correlated with IFS were Gerres subfasciatus Cuvier, Girella tricuspidata (Qouy & Gaimard), Mugil cephalus L. and Pomatomus saltatrix (L.); and those correlated with AS were Platycephalus fuscus Cuvier and Acanthopagrus australis (Owen). By identifying the species that were best quantified by each method, this study facilitates accurate monitoring of key species within RFHs.
机译:在禁止商业捕鱼的部分保护性管理区域(如休闲钓鱼港(RFH)),可用于量化物种相对丰度的采样方法较少。因此,在这些领域需要一个框架来决定是否应基于以下方面进行抽样:(1)渔业独立技术; (2)依赖休闲渔业收成的依赖渔业的方法;或(3)两者结合。这项研究将诱饵远程水下视频台(BRUVS)和独立捕鱼调查(IFS)得出的与渔业无关的数据与基于休闲钓鱼者调查(AS)的与渔业有关的数据进行了比较,以确定每种方法中最好枚举的鱼类两个澳大利亚的RFH。每种方法都捕获/检测到不同的物种,并且始终如一地显示出与特定物种组的相对丰度的相关性。与BRUVS相关并被其最好地列举的物种是Microcanthus strigatus(Cuvier)和Pelates sexlineatus(Qouy&Gaimard)。与IFS相关的是Gerres subfasciatus Cuvier,Girella tricuspidata(Qouy&Gaimard),Mugil cephalus L.和Pomatomus saltatrix(L.)。与AS相关的是侧柏(Platycephalus fuscus Cuvier)和澳洲棘皮(Acanthopagrus australis)。通过确定用每种方法最好量化的物种,本研究有助于准确监测RFH中的关键物种。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号