...
首页> 外文期刊>Freshwater science >Evaluating AUSRIVAS predictive model performance for detecting simulated eutrophication effects on invertebrate assemblages
【24h】

Evaluating AUSRIVAS predictive model performance for detecting simulated eutrophication effects on invertebrate assemblages

机译:评估AUSRIVAS预测模型的性能以检测模拟的富营养化对无脊椎动物种群的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Confidence in any bioassessment method is related to its ability to detect ecological improvement or impairment.We evaluated Australian River Assessment (AUSRIVAS)-style predictive models built using referencesite data sets from the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), the Yukon Territory (YT; Canada), and the Laurentian Great Lakes (GL; North America) area. We evaluated model performance as ability to correctly assign reference condition with independent reference-site data. Evaluating model ability to detect human disturbance is generally more problematic because the actual condition of test sites is usually unknown. Independent reference-site data underwent simulated impairment by varying the proportions of sensitive, intermediate, and tolerant taxa to simulate degrees of eutrophication. Model performance was related to differences in data sets, such as number and distribution of invertebrate taxa. Sensitive taxa tended to have lower expected probabilities of occurrence than more-tolerant taxa, but the distribution of taxa grouped by tolerance categories also differed by data set. Thus, the models differed in ability to detect the simulated impairment. The ACT model performed best with respect to Type 1 error rates (0%) and the GL model the worst (38%). The YT model performed best (10% error) for detecting moderate impairment, and the ACT model detected all severely impaired sites. AUSRIVAS did not assign most mildly impaired sites to below-reference condition, but a reduction in observed/expected values for some of the mildly impaired sites was observed. Models did not detect mild impairment that simply changed taxon abundances because presence–absence data were used for models. However, in comparison with other models described in this special issue (that did use abundance data), the AUSRIVAS model performance was comparable or better for detecting the simulated moderate and severe impairments.
机译:对任何生物评估方法的信心都与其检测生态改善或破坏的能力有关。我们评估了澳大利亚河流评估(AUSRIVAS)风格的预测模型,这些模型是使用来自澳大利亚首都地区(育空地区)(YT; Canada)的参考地点数据集构建的),以及Laurentian Great Lakes(GL; North America)地区。我们将模型性能评估为能够使用独立的参考站点数据正确分配参考条件的能力。评估模型检测人为干扰的能力通常存在更多问题,因为测试地点的实际状况通常是未知的。独立的参考站点数据通过更改敏感,中级和宽容分类单元的比例来模拟富营养化程度,从而进行了模拟损伤。模型性能与数据集的差异有关,例如无脊椎动物分类群的数量和分布。敏感分类群的发生概率往往比宽容分类群低,但按容忍度类别分组的分类群分布也因数据集而异。因此,模型检测模拟损伤的能力不同。就1类错误率而言,ACT模型表现最佳(0%),而GL模型则表现最差(38%)。 YT模型在检测中度损伤方面表现最好(10%误差),而ACT模型则检测到所有严重受损的部位。 AUSRIVAS并未将大多数轻度受损的部位指定为低于参考状态,但观察到某些轻度受损的部位的观察值/预期值降低了。模型没有检测到轻度的损害,只是通过改变存在/缺失数据来简单地改变分类单元的丰度。但是,与本期特刊中所述的其他模型(确实使用了丰度数据)相比,AUSRIVAS模型的性能在检测模拟中度和重度损伤方面具有可比性或更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号