首页> 外文期刊>Foster Natural Gas Report >Shippers Challenge Basis of Settlement Between Tennessee and Kinetica Energy Express; Kinetica Challenges Parts of FERC Ruling on Rates and Service To Be Provided on Facilities Abandoned by Tennessee
【24h】

Shippers Challenge Basis of Settlement Between Tennessee and Kinetica Energy Express; Kinetica Challenges Parts of FERC Ruling on Rates and Service To Be Provided on Facilities Abandoned by Tennessee

机译:托运人质疑田纳西州与Kinetica Energy Express之间的和解基础; Kinetica质疑FERC关于在田纳西州放弃的设施上提供的费率和服务的裁决的部分内容

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Indicated Shippers1, seeking rehearing, urged FERC to reject the settlement that underpins the deal on abandonment and jurisdiction negotiated between Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. LLC (CP12-490, RP12- 887)) and Kinetica Energy Express LLC (CP12-489) and approved subject to conditions on May 31.2 Indicated Shippers alleged the Commission’s approval of the settlement contravenes the Natural Gas Act (NGA), the objectives underlying the Commission’s settlement policy, and prior orders. Indicated Shippers insisted they do not oppose policies that encourage settlements. However, the spin-off settlement, they argued, differs materially from the settlements approved in the orders relied upon by the May 31 order, and adversely affects shippers and other stakeholders that were excluded from the negotiations, but provides them with no forum to protect their interests. On rehearing, the Commission must reject or revise the settlement.
机译:指示提货人1,寻求再审,敦促FERC拒绝为田纳西州燃气管道有限公司(CP12-490,RP12-887)和Kinetica Energy Express LLC(CP12-489)之间达成的放弃和管辖权谈判达成协议的和解协议,并获得批准在5月31.2日有条件的情况下,指示的托运人称委员会对和解的批准违反了天然气法(NGA),委员会和解政策的目标以及先前的命令。明确的托运人坚称,他们不反对鼓励定居的政策。但是,他们认为,分拆和解与5月31日命令所依据的订单所批准的和解存在重大差异,并且对被排除在谈判之外的托运人和其他利益相关者产生了不利影响,但没有为其提供保护的论坛他们的利益。进行听证时,委员会必须拒绝或修改和解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号