首页> 外文期刊>Foster Natural Gas Report >INGAA STRONGLY DISPUTES FERC'S CHARACTERIZATION OF BURDENS THAT PIPELINES FACE WITH NEW REPORTING REQUIREMENTS; NGSA WEIGHS IN ON NEED FOR STANDARDS FOR GAS STORAGE REPORTS
【24h】

INGAA STRONGLY DISPUTES FERC'S CHARACTERIZATION OF BURDENS THAT PIPELINES FACE WITH NEW REPORTING REQUIREMENTS; NGSA WEIGHS IN ON NEED FOR STANDARDS FOR GAS STORAGE REPORTS

机译:INGAA强烈反对FERC的Burdens表征,即管道面临着新的报告要求; NGSA称量气体存储报告标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On 2/22/11 the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA) formally requested rehearing and clarification of FERC Order No. 710-B (RM07-9), Revisions to Forms, Statements, and Reporting Requirements for Natural Gas Pipelines, issued 1/20/11. INGAA had previously argued in its comments that the proposal to require pipelines to separately report fuel use in Form 2 on pages 521a and 521b for transactions that use discounted or negotiated rates would require pipelines to track fuel use by individual contract. Because pipelines operate on an integrated basis, requiring them to separate out the amount of fuel consumed as part of discounted or negotiated rate agreements, regardless of whether the pipeline is waiving or discounting the fuel component of its rates under such agreements, would be unnecessarily burdensome and would produce data that is neither useful nor reliable.1
机译:11年2月22日,美国州际天然气协会(INGAA)正式要求对FERC第710-B号命令(RM07-9),对天然气管道的表格,声明和报告要求的修订进行了听证和澄清。 1/20/11。 INGAA以前曾在其意见中辩称,要求管道使用折价或议定价格的交易要求管道分别在521a和521b页的表格2中报告燃料使用的提案将需要管道跟踪单个合同的燃料使用。由于管道是在综合基础上运行的,因此要求管道将折算或议定的费率协议中所消耗的燃料量分开,而不论管道是否在此类协议中放弃或折现其费率的燃料部分,都将不必要地增加负担并且会产生既无用也不可靠的数据。1

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号