首页> 外文期刊>Forest Ecology and Management >Integration of small-scale canopy dynamics smoothes live-tree structural complexity across development stages in old-growth Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) forests at the multi-gap scale
【24h】

Integration of small-scale canopy dynamics smoothes live-tree structural complexity across development stages in old-growth Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) forests at the multi-gap scale

机译:小型冠层动力学的集成在多间隙尺度上消除了老生长的东方山毛榉(Fagus Orientalis Lipsky)森林中整个开发阶段的活树结构复杂性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the need to identify managerially operational live-tree structural conditions that distinguish among the stages of the mosaic development cycle, no previous work has quantified the three-dimensional structural heterogeneity of different development stages in Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis) forests. We examined live-tree structural heterogeneity at the 1 ha scale in three replicates each of the Initial, Optimal, and Decay development stages in primeval Caspian beech forests in Iran. Typical uneven-aged structures (reverse-J shaped diameter distributions) were observed across the three development stages, which did not differ in live-tree density, basal area, the standard deviation of tree diameters, the diameter differentiation index, or the number of large and extra-large trees with diameters greater than 52.5 cm or 72.5 cm, respectively. The Optimal stage was only differentiated from the Decay stage by having more small (16.5-32.5 cm DBH) trees, greater spatial clustering, and lower variation in tree size mixture. In contrast, the Initial stage differed from the Optimal/Decay stages by having higher density of very-small (<16.5 cm DBH) trees, lower density of medium (32.5-52.5 cm DBH) trees, greater inequity in the diameter distribution (CV, Gini coefficient), neighborhood-scale tree sizes, and vertical size differentiation, and greater small scale structural complexity. Although large trees were necessary for high structural complexity, differences in development stages were mostly due to differences in the abundance and spatial pattern of very-small and small trees. As a consequence of small-scale gap dynamics in forests-dominated by a long-lived and shade-tolerant species, the widespread intermixture of small and large trees established in the Initial stage persists throughout the Optimal stage and into the Decay stage before the development cycle repeats. Accordingly, rather than oscillations between stages of heterogeneous and homogeneous live-tree abundance (captured by density, basal area, and diameter distributions), the development stages instead reflected the cyclic appearance and disappearance of small canopy gaps (captured by spatial pattern and neighborhood scale size disparities). Due to such subtle differences in stand texture among development stages, the development stage model may not be managerially practical. However, given the constancy of large canopy trees and the subsequent greater relative importance of small trees, our findings indicate that nature-based management in Oriental beech forests may be best focused on utilizing continuous cover approaches (e:g., selection system, Swiss Femelschlag or irregular shelterwood) that recreate temporal cycles in the distribution of abundance among tree size classes rather than maintain constant patterns of total abundance. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管需要确定管理上可操作的活树结构条件,以区分马赛克发育周期的各个阶段,但之前的工作都没有量化东方山毛榉(Fagus Orientalis)森林中不同发育阶段的三维结构异质性。我们在伊朗原始里海山毛榉森林的初始,最佳和衰减发育阶段中的三个重复阶段中,研究了1公顷规模的活树结构异质性。在三个开发阶段观察到典型的不均匀老化结构(呈反J形的直径分布),它们在活树密度,基础面积,树径的标准偏差,直径差异指数或数量上没有差异。直径分别大于52.5厘米或72.5厘米的大树和特大树。最佳阶段与衰落阶段的区别仅在于具有更多的小树(16.5-32.5 cm DBH),更大的空间聚类和更低的树木大小混合变化。相比之下,初始阶段与最佳/衰减阶段有所不同,其具有非常小的(<16.5 cm DBH)树的较高密度,较低的中等(32.5-52.5 cm DBH)树的密度,较大的直径分布(CV)不均匀性,基尼系数),邻域尺度的树大小以及垂直尺度的差异,以及更大的小尺度结构复杂性。尽管大树木对于高结构复杂性是必需的,但开发阶段的差异主要是由于非常小的树木的丰度和空间格局的差异。由于森林中的小间隙动态,以长寿和耐荫的树种为主导,因此在初始阶段建立的小树和大树的广泛混合一直持续到最佳阶段,直至发展之前的衰变阶段循环重复。因此,开发阶段而不是异质和均质活树丰度阶段(由密度,基础面积和直径分布捕获)之间的振荡,而是发育阶段反映了小冠层间隙的周期性出现和消失(由空间模式和邻域尺度捕获)尺寸差异)。由于开发阶段之间林分质地的细微差异,开发阶段模型可能在管理上不可行。但是,考虑到大树冠的恒定性以及小树冠的重要性,我们的研究结果表明,东方山毛榉森林中基于自然的管理可能最好集中于利用连续覆盖方法(例如,选择系统,瑞士Femelschlag或不规则的防护林)在树的大小级别之间重新创建了丰度分布的时间周期,而不是保持总丰度的恒定模式。 (C)2014 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号