...
首页> 外文期刊>Foster Natural Gas Report >Kern River Pursues Two Paths to Recover Deferred Depreciation Expenses
【24h】

Kern River Pursues Two Paths to Recover Deferred Depreciation Expenses

机译:克恩河(Kern River)采取两条途径追回递延折旧费用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Kern River Gas Transmission Co. (RP10-1406) defended its September 30 tariff proposal filed with FERC to implement a periodic rate adjustment (PRA) that is designed to ensure recovery of deferred depreciation expenses arising from investments in replacement compressor engines and general plant (CE/GP). Protests were filed against Kern River's PRA by Calpine Energy Services, LP; Nevada Power Co.; BP Energy Co.; Southern California Gas Co. and San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (SoCal/SDG&E); the Rolled-ln Customer Group (RCG); Southern California Generation Coalition; and Morgan Stanley Capital Group. (FNGR No. 2818, pp20-22) The interveners contend that Kern River's proposal to recover deferred costs through a PRA should be rejected. But Kern River complained that these same parties assert that the deferred costs cannot be recovered in Period Two rates and that Kern River has not properly designed its compliance rates to recover them in Period One. The Commission cannot let these parties "play a shell game with Kern River's Commission-approved depreciation expenses."
机译:Kern River Gas Transmission Co.(RP10-1406)为9月30日向FERC提交的电价提案进行了辩护,以实施定期费率调整(PRA),以确保收回因更换压缩机发动机和一般工厂的投资而产生的递延折旧费用( CE / GP)。 Calpine Energy Services,LP对Kern River的PRA提出了抗议;内华达州电力公司; BP能源公司;南加州天然气公司和圣地亚哥天然气和电力公司(SoCal / SDG&E);滚入客户组(RCG);南加州发电联盟;摩根士丹利资本集团。 (FNGR第2818号,第20-22页)干预者认为,克恩里弗(Kern River)通过PRA收回递延成本的提议应被拒绝。但是,克恩·里弗抱怨说,这些相同的当事方断言不能在第二期的费率中收回递延成本,并且克恩·里弗没有适当地设计其履约费率来在第一期中收回。委员会不能让这些当事方“与克恩·里弗批准的折旧费用进行一场空壳游戏”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号