...
首页> 外文期刊>Forestry >Natural regeneration of pine plantations in South Africa as a cost-effective way of stand re-establishment.
【24h】

Natural regeneration of pine plantations in South Africa as a cost-effective way of stand re-establishment.

机译:南非松树人工林的天然更新是一种经济有效的林分重建方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For about 100 years, South African forestry developed a paradigm of highly intensive and expensive silvicultural technology practiced predominantly by large corporations. A broad scientific perspective on diverse silvicultural options for a wide variety of users has received little attention. As costs of intensive silviculture grow with increasing costs of energy, machinery and chemicals, large plantation areas are likely to be deforested with detrimental impacts on jobs, existing infrastructure and rural economy. This study shows an example of how timber production and profitability of pine plantations can be improved with the use of cheaper natural stand regeneration. Large-scale compartment data from the Cape plantations showed a significant trend for improved timber yields in naturally regenerated stands of Pinus radiata D. Don but not in P. pinaster Aiton. The Equivalent Annual Income (EAI) for P. radiata was improved on a hectare basis by up to US$14.8 due to (1) a saving of up to US$208.6 on tree establishment and (2) higher timber volume in naturally regenerated stands. The EAI is improved even where timber yields are significantly less, as is the case with P. pinaster, because of lower establishment costs. Assuming that natural regeneration can be successfully implemented in other parts of the country, the extrapolation of these results to two-thirds of the total area under pines, produced an impressive prospective saving of US$5 million per year or additional profit of over US$11.2 million based on a modest 4 per cent real interest rate and a 22-year average rotation cycle. Therefore, the unqualified exclusion of natural regeneration of pines may be a serious economic and social mistake made by large and small timber growers alike to the detriment of forestry-based rural development in South Africa.
机译:大约100年以来,南非林业发展出一种集约化,昂贵的造林技术范例,主要由大公司实践。对于广泛的用户而言,关于各种造林选择的广泛科学观点很少受到关注。随着集约化造林成本随着能源,机械和化学品成本的增加而增长,大型人工林很可能被砍伐,对就业,现有基础设施和农村经济造成不利影响。这项研究显示了一个例子,说明了如何通过使用廉价的天然林木再生来改善松树人工林的木材产量和获利能力。开普(Cape)人工林的大规模车厢数据显示,辐射松(D. Don)天然更新林分的木材单产显着提高,但Pinaster Aiton则没有。由于(1)树木节省高达208.6美元,以及(2)天然再生林的木材产量增加,辐射松的等效年收入(EAI)每公顷提高了14.8美元。甚至由于木材成本较低,即使在木材单产显着降低的情况下,EAI也得以改善,P。pinaster就是这种情况。假设可以在该国其他地区成功实施自然更新,那么将这些结果推算到松树总面积的三分之二,每年可节省500万美元的可观成本,或可额外获利1,120万美元基于适中的4%实际利率和22年的平均轮换周期。因此,无限制地将松树的自然再生排除在外可能会成为大型和小型木材种植者犯下的严重的经济和社会错误,对南非的以林业为基础的农村发展不利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号