...
首页> 外文期刊>Fish and Fisheries >Individual transferable quotas and ecosystem-based fisheries management: it's all in the T
【24h】

Individual transferable quotas and ecosystem-based fisheries management: it's all in the T

机译:个人可转让配额和基于生态系统的渔业管理:这一切都在T中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Recent articles in high-profile journals advocating the widespread establishment of economic rights-based approaches for managing fisheries has re-kindled the debate over the efficacy of incentive-based vs. regulatory-based management approaches. Inspection of these works, written from the particular perspectives of economics, fisheries biology, or marine ecology, reveals that advocates of rights-based regimes such as Individual Transferrable Quotas are sometimes recommending these policy instruments for quite different reasons. Hence, the advantageous attributes of rights-based approaches from the perspective of one discipline may be quite different when seen from the perspective of another discipline. This is of concern as it exposes a tendency for particular disciplines to consider only the advantages of rights-based approaches, such as establishing a harvest cap, but to implicitly discount the disadvantages such as less attention being paid to critical ecological and ecosystem issues.
机译:备受瞩目的期刊上最近发表的文章提倡广泛建立基于经济权利的渔业管理方法,这重新引发了关于基于激励的管理方法与基于监管的管理方法有效性的争论。从经济学,渔业生物学或海洋生态学的特定角度对这些著作进行的检查表明,基于权利的制度的倡导者,例如个人可转让配额,有时出于完全不同的原因而推荐这些政策工具。因此,从另一门学科的角度来看,基于权利的方法从一门学科的角度来看的有利属性可能会完全不同。令人关注的是,这暴露出特定学科倾向于仅考虑基于权利的方法的优点(例如建立收获上限),却隐含地消除了诸如对关键生态和生态系统问题的关注较少等缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号