...
首页> 外文期刊>Forest Science >Density of Large Snags and Logs in Northern Arizona Mixed-Conifer and Ponderosa Pine Forests
【24h】

Density of Large Snags and Logs in Northern Arizona Mixed-Conifer and Ponderosa Pine Forests

机译:亚利桑那州北部针叶树和美国黄松林的大断枝和原木的密度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Large snags and logs provide important biological legacies and resources for native wildlife, yet data on populations of large snags and logs and factors influencing those populations are sparse. We monitored populations of large snags and logs in mixed-conifer and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests in northern Arizona from 1997 through 2012. We modeled density of large snags and logs as a function of forest type, time period, and environmental characteristics of sampled plots. Our objective was to build models that best explained current densities of these structures using these available covariates. The best model for density of large snags indicated that snag density was greater in mixed-conifer than in ponderosa pine forests, lower in plots with evidence of past timber or fuelwood harvest than in plots lacking such evidence, and covaried positively with mean slope and distance to road. The best model for density of large logs indicated that log density was greater in mixed-conifer than in ponderosa pine forests and covaried positively with solar insolation and surface ratio (an index of topographic roughness). The best snag model predicted that current US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service guidelines for retention of large snags were met only in mixed-conifer forests lacking evidence of past harvest activity. In contrast, the USDA Forest Service guidelines for retention of large logs were met in both forest types. Our results suggest that ease of human access and management history influence density of large snags, that current snag guidelines are unlikely to be met without considering these impacts, and that those guidelines may not be readily attainable in much of the landscape.
机译:大断枝和原木为本地野生动植物提供了重要的生物学遗产和资源,但是有关大断枝和原木的种群数据以及影响这些种群的因素却很少。我们监测了1997年至2012年亚利桑那州北部针叶树和美国黄松(Pinus积木)混交林中大断枝和原木的种群。我们根据森林类型,时间段和环境特征对大断枝和原木的密度进行了建模。样地。我们的目标是使用这些可用的协变量建立能够最好地解释这些结构的当前密度的模型。最好的大障碍物密度模型表明,混合针叶树的障碍物密度比美国黄松林更大,在有过往木材或薪材采伐证据的地块中,其密度比在缺乏此类证据的地块中低,并且与平均坡度和距离呈正相关上路。最佳的大原木密度模型表明,混合针叶树的原木密度比美国黄松林大,并且与日照和表面比率(地形粗糙度指数)呈正相关。最佳障碍模型预测,仅在缺乏过去收获活动证据的混合针叶林中,才能满足美国农业部(USDA)当前关于保留较大障碍的森林服务指南。相比之下,两种类型的森林都符合美国农业部森林服务局关于保留大块原木的准则。我们的结果表明,人类获取和管理的难易程度会影响大型障碍物的密度,如果不考虑这些影响,就不可能满足当前的障碍物准则,并且在许多情况下这些准则可能不容易实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号