首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science, medicine, and pathology >Current issues in species identification for forensic science and the validity of using the cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene.
【24h】

Current issues in species identification for forensic science and the validity of using the cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene.

机译:法医学鉴定物种的当前问题以及使用细胞色素氧化酶I(COI)基因的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Species identification techniques commonly utilized in Australian Forensic Science laboratories are gel immunodifussion antigen antibody reactions and hair comparison analysis. Both of these techniques have significant limitations and should be considered indicative opinion based tests. The Barcode of Life Initiative aims to sequence a section of DNA (~648 base pairs) for the Cytochrome Oxidase I mitochondrial gene (COI) in all living species on Earth, with the data generated being uploaded to the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) which can then be used for species identification. The COI gene therefore offers forensics scientists an opportunity to use the marker to analyze unknown samples and compare sequences generated in BOLD. Once sequences from enough species are on the database, it is anticipated that routine identification of an unknown species may be possible. However, most forensic laboratories are not yet suited to this type of analysis and do not have the expertise to fully interpret the implications of matches and non matches involving a poorly sampled taxa (for example where there are cryptic species) and in providing the required opinion evidence. Currently, the use of BOLD is limited by the number of relevant species held in the database and the quality assurance and regulation of sequences that are there. In this paper, the COI methodology and BOLD are tested on a selection of introduced and Australian mammals in a forensic environment as the first step necessary in the implementation of this approach in the Australian context. Our data indicates that the COI methodology performs well on distinct species but needs further exploration when identifying more closely related species. It is evident from our study that changes will be required to implement DNA based wildlife forensics using the BOLD approach for forensic applications and recommendations are made for the future adoption of this technology into forensic laboratories.
机译:澳大利亚法医学实验室通常使用的物种鉴定技术是凝胶免疫扩散抗原抗体反应和头发比较分析。这两种技术都有很大的局限性,应被视为基于指示性意见的测试。 《生命条形码计划》旨在对地球上所​​有生物物种中细胞色素氧化酶I线粒体基因(COI)的DNA片段进行测序(约648个碱基对),并将生成的数据上传至生命条形码数据库(BOLD)然后可以用于物种识别。因此,COI基因为法医科学家提供了使用标记物分析未知样品并比较以BOLD生成的序列的机会。一旦来自足够物种的序列存储在数据库中,就可以对未知物种进行常规鉴定。但是,大多数法医实验室尚不适合这种类型的分析,还没有专业知识来完全解释涉及分类单元采样不佳(例如存在隐蔽物种的情况)的匹配和不匹配的含义,以及无法提供所需的意见证据。当前,BOLD的使用受到数据库中保存的相关物种数量以及那里序列的质量保证和调控的限制。在本文中,COI方法和粗体测试是在法医环境中对一些引进的和澳大利亚哺乳动物进行测试的,这是在澳大利亚实施这种方法所必需的第一步。我们的数据表明,COI方法论在不同物种上表现良好,但在确定更密切相关的物种时需要进一步探索。从我们的研究中可以明显看出,使用BOLD方法进行基于DNA的野生生物取证需要进行法医应用,并提出了建议,建议将来将该技术用于法医实验室。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号