首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science international >Examining the impact of opioid analgesics on crash responsibility in truck drivers involved in fatal crashes
【24h】

Examining the impact of opioid analgesics on crash responsibility in truck drivers involved in fatal crashes

机译:检查阿片类镇痛药对涉及致命碰撞的卡车驾驶员的碰撞责任的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: Commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers, particularly drivers of large trucks continue to be a population of concern regarding traffic safety despite the reduction in large truck crash rates over the past decade. Medication and drug use while driving is one important risk factor for large truck crashes. Work-related exposures, such as vibration, manual handling and poor ergonomics contribute to an increased risk for injuries and chronic conditions and are common reasons for opioid analgesic (OA) use by CMV truck drivers. The objectives of this study were to examine the role of OA use in CMV truck drivers involved in fatal crashes by: (a) generating prevalence estimates of OA use; (b) documenting the relationship between OA use and crash responsibility. Methods: Case-control study using logistic regression to compare Fatality Analysis Reporting System (1993-2008) record of one or more crash-related unsafe driver actions (UDAs - a proxy measure of responsibility) between drivers with a positive drug test and drivers with a negative drug test for OA, controlling for age, other drug use, and driving history. Results: The annual prevalence of OA use among all CMV drivers of large trucks involved in fatal crashes did not exceed 0.46% for any year in the study period and mostly ranged between 0.1 and 0.2%. Male truck drivers using OA had greater odds of committing an UDA (OR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.64; 4.81). Middle-aged users had greater odds than younger or older users. Conclusion: The results of our study indicate that the presence of OAs is associated with greater odds of committing an UDA. This association may have implications for the commercial transport industry and traffic safety. However, the limited prevalence of OA use is encouraging and further research is needed to address the limitations of the study.
机译:简介:尽管过去十年中大型卡车的撞车率有所下降,但商用汽车(CMV)驾驶员,尤其是大型卡车的驾驶员仍是交通安全关注的焦点。驾车时使用药物和吸毒是大卡车撞车的重要风险因素之一。与工作相关的暴露,例如振动,手动操作和不良的人体工程学,导致受伤和慢性病风险增加,并且是CMV卡车驾驶员使用阿片类镇痛剂(OA)的常见原因。这项研究的目的是通过以下方法来检查OA使用在涉及致命事故的CMV卡车驾驶员中的作用:(a)得出OA使用的普遍性估计; (b)记录OA使用与崩溃责任之间的关系。方法:病例对照研究,采用逻辑回归比较致命分析报告系统(1993-2008)的一项或多项与碰撞相关的不安全驾驶员行为(UDA-责任的替代措施)的记录,这些试验在药物测试呈阳性的驾驶员与在药物试验呈阳性的驾驶员之间进行。 OA的阴性药物测试,可控制年龄,其他药物使用和驾驶记录。结果:在研究期间的任何一年中,涉及致命撞车的大型卡车的所有CMV驾驶员中,OA的年使用率均不超过0.46%,且大多在0.1%和0.2%之间。使用OA的男性卡车司机犯UDA的几率更大(OR:2.80; 95%CI:1.64; 4.81)。中年用户比年轻或年长用户的几率更大。结论:我们的研究结果表明,OA的存在与提交UDA的可能性更高。这种联系可能会对商业运输业和交通安全产生影响。但是,OA使用的有限流行是令人鼓舞的,需要进一步研究以解决研究的局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号