...
首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science international >Comparison of stab wound probing versus radiological stab wound channel depiction with contrast medium
【24h】

Comparison of stab wound probing versus radiological stab wound channel depiction with contrast medium

机译:用对比剂比较刺伤探查与放射学刺伤通道描绘的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Instillation of contrast medium into stab wounds has shown promising results regarding visibility and assessment of general stab direction with computed tomography. However, the accuracy of this method - and, incidentally also probing of stab wounds - has to our knowledge not previously been examined. Also the effect of bluntness of different stabbing objects on the examination of stab wounds was not considered before this study. Methods: Using a pocket-knife, a steak-knife, and a Phillips screwdriver, nine stab wounds each were inflicted to three pork haunches. The depths of the stab wounds were determined by probing and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) after instillation of a contrast medium (CM) and then compared to those observed by dissection, our internal "gold standard". Results: In stab wounds inflicted by knives, MSCT-CM and probing provided results which differed by roughly 10-11% from the dissection results. In screwdriver stabs MSCT-CM showed a deviation of almost 30%, probing over 33%. Discussion: MSCT-CM is a possible alternative to layer-by-layer dissection in autopsy cases of knife stab wounds. Probing, although obsolete in post-mortem examinations, is sufficiently accurate in determining the length of a stab wound of a living person. In cases of stab wounds with blunt objects such as screwdrivers, neither MSCT-CM nor probing proved to be sufficiently accurate. Conclusion: MSCT-CM is a possible alternative to layer-by-layer dissection in autopsy cases of knife stab wounds. Probing, although obsolete in post-mortem examinations, is sufficiently accurate in determining the length of a stab wound of a living person. In cases of stab wounds with blunt objects such as screwdrivers, neither MSCT-CM nor probing proved to be sufficiently accurate.
机译:背景:将造影剂滴入刺伤中已显示出可观的结果,有关可见性和使用计算机断层摄影术评估一般刺伤方向。然而,据我们所知,这种方法的准确性(以及偶然发现刺伤的准确性)以前并未得到检查。在此研究之前,也没有考虑过不同刺伤对象的钝性对刺伤检查的影响。方法:用一把小刀,一把牛排刀和一把十字螺丝刀,将三个刺头分别刺伤9个刺伤。在注入造影剂(CM)之后,通过探查和多层计算机断层扫描(MSCT)确定刺伤的深度,然后将其与解剖法(我们的内部“金标准”)进行比较。结果:在由刀造成的刺伤中,MSCT-CM和探测提供的结果与解剖结果相差约10-11%。在螺丝刀中,MSCT-CM的偏差接近30%,探测超过33%。讨论:在刀刺伤的尸检病例中,MSCT-CM可能是逐层解剖的替代方法。尽管在验尸检查中已经过时,但在确定活人刺伤的长度方面,探测是足够准确的。如果用螺丝刀等钝物刺伤,则MSCT-CM和探测都无法证明是足够准确的。结论:对于刀刺伤的尸检病例,MSCT-CM可能是逐层剥离的替代方法。尽管在验尸检查中已经过时,但在确定活人刺伤的长度方面,探测是足够准确的。如果用螺丝刀等钝物刺伤,则MSCT-CM和探测都无法证明是足够准确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号