...
首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science international >Diagnosis of drowning by summation of sodium, potassium and chloride ion levels in pleural effusion: Differentiating between freshwater and seawater drowning and application to bathtub deaths
【24h】

Diagnosis of drowning by summation of sodium, potassium and chloride ion levels in pleural effusion: Differentiating between freshwater and seawater drowning and application to bathtub deaths

机译:通过求和胸腔积液中钠,钾和氯离子含量的总和来诊断溺水:区分淡水和海水淹没并应用于浴缸死亡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although electrolyte analysis of pleural effusion at autopsy is useful for the diagnosis of water aspiration (i.e., drowning), the method of comparing each level of sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), and chloride (Cl-) ions does not clearly differentiate between freshwater drowning, seawater drowning, and non-drowning. Therefore, here we introduce the summation of Na+, K+, and Cl- levels, that is SUMNa+K+Cl, as a modified diagnostic indicator. In 21 autopsy cases of freshwater drowning, 32 cases of seawater drowning, and 43 non-drowning controls (with pleural effusion), mean SUMNa+K+Cl differed significantly between the groups (188.8±33.2, 403.5±107.9, and 239.3±21.7mEq/L, respectively). We defined a SUMNa+K+Cl cut-off value of 195.9mEq/L as strongly suggestive of freshwater aspiration and that of 282.7mEq/L as strongly suggestive of seawater aspiration. When these values were applied to the two drowning groups, 15 cases (71%) of freshwater drowning and 29 cases (91%) of seawater drowning were diagnosed correctly. This new approach may be more valid than previous methods in cases found 2 days after death or those with substantial pleural effusion (100mL). For an additional 15 bathtub deaths, mean SUMNa+K+Cl was 198.8±40.0mEq/L, and in 14 of these cases (93%) the relationship between cause of death and SUMNa+K+Cl could be explained using this method. Forensic pathologists should not depend exclusively on chemical findings and should consider also typical pathological indicators of drowning. This new method may be useful as a supplementary diagnostic tool when used alongside consideration of the pathological findings.
机译:尽管在尸检时对胸腔积液进行电解质分析可用于诊断吸水(即溺水),但比较钠离子(Na +),钾离子(K +)和氯离子(Cl-)的水平的方法并不能清晰地区分在淡水淹没,海水淹没和不淹水之间。因此,在这里我们介绍Na +,K +和Cl-的总和,即SUMNa + K + Cl,作为改良的诊断指标。在21例淡水淹死,32例海水淹死和43例非溺水对照(有胸腔积液)的尸检病例中,两组之间的SUMNa + K + Cl平均值存在显着差异(188.8±33.2、403.5±107.9和239.3±21.7) mEq / L)。我们将SUMNa + K + Cl截止值定义为<195.9mEq / L,强烈暗示着淡水抽吸,而将> 282.7mEq / L的临界值强烈暗示着海水抽吸。将这些值应用于两个溺水组时,可以正确诊断出15例(71%)的淡水溺水和29例(91%)的海水淹没。在死亡后两天以上或有大量胸腔积液(> 100mL)的病例中,这种新方法可能比以前的方法更有效。对于另外15例浴缸死亡,平均SUMNa + K + Cl为198.8±40.0mEq / L,其中14例(93%)可使用此方法解释死亡原因与SUMNa + K + Cl之间的关系。法医病理学家不应仅依赖化学结果,还应考虑溺水的典型病理指标。与考虑病理结果同时使用时,这种新方法可能可用作辅助诊断工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号