...
首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science international >Extraction of DNA from decomposed human tissue. An evaluation of five extraction methods for short tandem repeat typing.
【24h】

Extraction of DNA from decomposed human tissue. An evaluation of five extraction methods for short tandem repeat typing.

机译:从分解的人体组织中提取DNA。对短串联重复打字的五种提取方法的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Hyperpolymorphic short tandem repetitive DNA sequences, STRs or microsatellites, have become widely used in human identification, particularly in criminal cases and in mass disasters. In such cases the substrates for the analyses may be decomposed biological material, a fact that has to be taken into account when choosing the appropriate casework methods. In this paper we report the evaluation of five different DNA extraction methods, namely the phenol-chloroform, the silica based, the InstaGene Matrix (BioTest), the glass fiber filter, and the Chelex based methods. The substrates for the analyses are decomposed human liver tissue specimens from forensic autopsy cases. Extracted DNA was quantified and DNA profiled by a set of seven STRs. We have compared laboratory time consumption and costs of the five methods, showing that the Chelex method is the more rapid and less expensive of the methods, the phenol-chlorophorm and silica extractions being the most time consuming and resource demanding ones. A full profile was obtained by the silica method in nine out of ten cases and this method failed to give a reliable type in four out of 70 STR analyses. The phenol-chlorophorm and the glass fiber filter methods failed in 16 analyses, the InstaGene Matrix (BioTest) in 25 and the Chelex extracts in 56 of the 70 STR analyses. By multiple logistic regression we show that the difference between the silica procedure and the other methods are statistically significant. In our hands, the silica gel extraction procedure is an obvious choice when the biological material available is decomposed human tissue--even if this procedure is one of the more laborious ones.
机译:超多态短串联重复DNA序列,STR或微卫星已广泛用于人类识别,特别是在刑事案件和大灾难中。在这种情况下,用于分析的底物可能会分解为生物材料,选择适当的案例研究方法时必须考虑到这一事实。在本文中,我们报告了对五种不同DNA提取方法的评估,分别是苯酚-氯仿,二氧化硅,InstaGene Matrix(BioTest),玻璃纤维过滤器和Chelex方法。用于分析的底物是从法医尸检病例中分解出的人类肝脏组织标本。定量提取的DNA,并通过一组七个STR对DNA进行分析。我们比较了这五种方法的实验室时间消耗和成本,结果表明,Chelex方法是该方法中更快,更便宜的方法,酚-氯仿和二氧化硅萃取是最耗时和最耗资源的方法。硅胶法在十个案例中有九个获得了完整的轮廓,而这种方法在70个STR分析中有四个未能给出可靠的类型。在70次STR分析中,苯酚-氯霉素和玻璃纤维过滤器方法在16次分析中失败,InstaGene Matrix(BioTest)在25次中失败,而Chelex提取物在56次分析中失败。通过多重逻辑回归,我们表明,硅胶工艺与其他方法之间的差异具有统计学意义。在我们手中,当可用的生物材料分解人体组织时,硅胶萃取程序是一个显而易见的选择,即使该程序是比较费力的一种。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号