首页> 外文期刊>Gynecologie, obstetrique & fertilit >A study comparing previous induced abortion rates in populations of newly delivered women and infertile women.
【24h】

A study comparing previous induced abortion rates in populations of newly delivered women and infertile women.

机译:一项研究比较了新分娩妇女和不育妇女人口中先前的人工流产率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: For years, induced abortions (IA) have been deemed responsible for altered fertility. The implication of various mechanisms including tubal infertility, intra-uterine adhesions, spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy, cervical incompetence, shortened gestations, and any psychological trouble leading to anovulation has been raised. Though many authors find no evidence of an increased risk on fertility for women, whose IA is not complicated by infection, it might sometimes be insinuated that infertility is the consequence of previous abortion. Thus, we compared the rate of patients with any prior IA in a population of newly delivered women and in women ongoing IVF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at Sevres hospital, comparing two populations of women, newly delivered women (n=1738) between January 1st and December 31st 2005, and women ongoing IVF at the same period (n=430). We reported the number of previous medical or surgical induced abortions and compared it in both groups. Another analysis compared these rates, among two subgroups of women with one or more prior pregnancy (secondary infertility (n=148), and secondary gestation (n=1088). RESULTS: The rate of prior IA was not different in the two populations. In the IVF group, 13% (n=56) had undergone one or more IA, versus 16.7% (n=291) in the newly delivered group (P=0.06). Among women with previous pregnancy, 37.8% (56) women of the IVF group had undergone one or more previous IA, versus 26.7% (291) of the newly delivered women (P=0.007). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: As expected by literature data on IA and fertility, rates of prior induced abortions were not different in the population of fertile women versus infertile. However, women with one or more previous pregnancy are more likely to have undergone previous IA in the IVF group than in the newly delivered group, possibly due to a bias of age. More data are requested to eliminate linkage between IA and infertility.
机译:目的:多年来,人工流产一直被认为是导致生育能力改变的原因。已经提出了各种机制的含义,包括输卵管不育,子宫内粘连,自然流产,异位妊娠,宫颈功能不全,妊娠期缩短以及导致无排卵的任何心理问题。尽管许多作者没有发现证据表明女性的生育风险增加,而女性的IA并未因感染而并发,但有时可能会暗示不育是先前流产的结果。因此,我们比较了新分娩妇女和进行中的IVF妇女中任何先前IA患者的比率。患者与方法:在Sevres医院进行了一项回顾性研究,比较了两组妇女,即2005年1月1日至12月31日之间的新分娩妇女(n = 1738)和同期进行IVF的妇女(n = 430)。我们报告了先前的医学或外科手术人工流产的数量,并在两组中进行了比较。另一项分析比较了先前怀孕一次或多次(继发性不孕(n = 148)和继发妊娠(n = 1088))的两个亚组女性中的这些比率。结果:在这两个人群中,先前IA的比率没有差异。试管婴儿组中有13%(n = 56)经历了一次或多次IA,而新分娩组中有16.7%(n = 291)(P = 0.06)。先前妊娠的妇女中有37.8%(56)妇女试管婴儿组中有过一次或多次IA,而新分娩妇女中有26.7%(291)(P = 0.007)。讨论与结论:如关于IA和生育率的文献数据所预期的那样,先前人工流产的发生率没有育龄妇女和不育妇女的数量有所不同,但是,由于年龄的偏见,IVF组比刚分娩的组中有一次或多次怀孕的女性更可能接受过先前的IA。消除IA与不育之间的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号