首页> 外文期刊>Flow Measurement and Instrumentation >Uncertainty evaluation procedure and intercomparison of bell provers as a calibration system for gas flow meters
【24h】

Uncertainty evaluation procedure and intercomparison of bell provers as a calibration system for gas flow meters

机译:不确定度评估程序和作为气体流量计校准系统的钟形校正仪的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many NMIs (national measurement institutes) and calibration laboratories worldwide use a bell prover as a calibration system for gas flow meters. The basic definition and procedure to estimate the bell prover uncertainty have been given in previous studies. After the announcement of a mutual recognition agreement (MRA) in 1998 by the BIPM (Bureau International des Poids at Mesures), many NMIs have needed to have more details of uncertainty evaluation procedure of the bell prover. In this study, more details of the test procedure of bell prover uncertainty are presented with a modification of position of the temperature and the pressure sensor to measure more exact values. The other modification is to use three precise guide rods with bearings to make the pressure in the bell more stable. Furthermore, a laser interferometer is used to enhance the measurement accuracy of the testing time and the traveling length of the bell. The uncertainty of the bells estimated by the procedure given in this study is 0.13% at the confidence level of 95%, rather than 0.17% of the previous one. Recently, the results of CCM.FF-K6, which is an international comparison of NMIs organized by the CIPM (Comite International des Poids et Mesures), show that the uncertainty of the KRISS (Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science) bell prover estimated by this study is reasonable.
机译:全球许多NMI(国家测量机构)和校准实验室都使用钟形检定仪作为气体流量计的校准系统。先前的研究已经给出了估计钟形证明人不确定性的基本定义和过程。在BIPM(Mesures的国际局)于1998年宣布达成相互承认协议(MRA)之后,许多NMI都需要了解钟形证明人不确定性评估程序的更多细节。在这项研究中,通过修改温度和压力传感器的位置以测量更精确的值,介绍了钟形证明人不确定性测试程序的更多细节。另一种修改是使用三个带有轴承的精密导杆,以使钟罩中的压力更稳定。此外,使用激光干涉仪来提高测试时间和钟声的行进长度的测量精度。通过本研究中给出的方法估计的钟声的不确定度在95%的置信度下为0.13%,而不是前一个的0.17%。最近,由CIPM(Comite International des Poids et Mesures)组织的NMI的国际比较CCM.FF-K6的结果表明,KRISS(韩国标准与科学研究院)钟声证明者的不确定性估计为通过这项研究是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号