首页> 外文期刊>Food and Nutrition Bulletin >Fortification of wheat flour and maize meal with different iron compounds: results of a series of baking trials. (Special Issue: Large-scale food fortification: Optimizing program implementation - country experiences and technical considerations.)
【24h】

Fortification of wheat flour and maize meal with different iron compounds: results of a series of baking trials. (Special Issue: Large-scale food fortification: Optimizing program implementation - country experiences and technical considerations.)

机译:用不同的铁化合物强化小麦粉和玉米粉:一系列烘烤试验的结果。 (特刊:大规模食品强化:优化计划实施-国家经验和技术考虑。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. Wheat and maize flour fortification is a preventive food-based approach to improve the micronutrient status of populations. In 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) released recommendations for such fortification, with guidelines on the addition levels for iron, folic acid, vitamin B12, vitamin A, and zinc at various levels of average daily consumption. Iron is the micronutrient of greatest concern to the food industry, as some believe there may be some adverse interaction(s) in some or all of the finished products produced from wheat flour and maize meal. Objective. To determine if there were any adverse interactions due to selection of iron compounds and, if differences were noted, to quantify those differences. Methods. Wheat flour and maize meal were sourced in Kenya, South Africa, and Tanzania, and the iron compound (sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate [NaFeEDTA], ferrous fumarate, or ferrous sulfate) was varied and dosed at rates according to the WHO guidelines for consumption of 75 to 149 g/day of wheat flour and >300 g/day of maize meal and tested again for 150 to 300 g/day for both. Bread, chapatti, ugali (thick porridge), and uji (thin porridge) were prepared locally and assessed on whether the products were acceptable under industry-approved criteria and whether industry could discern any differences, knowing that differences existed, by academic sensory analysis using a combination of trained and untrained panelists and in direct side-by-side comparison. Results. Industry (the wheat and maize milling sector) scored the samples as well above the minimal standard, and under academic scrutiny no differences were reported. Side-by-side comparison by the milling industry did indicate some slight differences, mainly with respect to color, although these differences did not correlate with any particular iron compound. Conclusions. The levels of iron compounds used, in accordance with the WHO guidelines, do not lead to changes in the baking and cooking properties of the wheat flour and maize meal. Respondents trained to measure against a set benchmark and/or discern differences could not consistently replicate perceived difference observations.
机译:背景。小麦和玉米粉强化是一种预防性食物,可改善人群的微量营养素状况。 2009年,世界卫生组织(WHO)发布了有关此类强化的建议,并针对铁,叶酸,维生素B 12 ,维生素A和锌的添加水平制定了指导原则,每天平均添加各种水平消费。铁是食品工业最关注的微量营养素,因为有人认为,小麦粉和玉米粉制成的部分或全部成品中可能存在一些不利的相互作用。目的。确定是否由于选择了铁化合物而产生任何不利的相互作用,并确定是否存在差异,以量化这些差异。方法。小麦粉和玉米粉产自肯尼亚,南非和坦桑尼亚,铁化合物(乙二胺四乙酸钠铁[NaFeEDTA],富马酸亚铁或硫酸亚铁)的变化和剂量按照世界卫生组织关于消耗量的75指南进行。至每天149克小麦粉和> 300克/天玉米粉,并再次测试两者的150到300克/天。面包,薄煎饼,乌加利(稀粥)和(稀粥)均在当地制备,并根据行业认可的标准对产品是否合格进行了评估,并且通过使用学术感官分析使用已知的差异,行业是否可以辨别出任何差异经过培训的和未经培训的小组成员的组合,并且可以直接进行对比。结果。工业界(小麦和玉米制粉业)对样品的评分远高于最低标准,并且在学术审查下未报告差异。铣削行业的并排比较确实显示出一些细微的差异,主要在颜色方面,尽管这些差异与任何特定的铁化合物都不相关。结论根据WHO指南,所使用的铁化合物含量不会导致小麦粉和玉米粉的烘烤和烹饪特性发生变化。接受过针对既定基准和/或辨别差异进行衡量的受访者无法始终如一地复制感知到的差异观察结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号