【24h】

Alternative approaches to cervical stenosis To the Editor

机译:宫颈狭窄的替代方法编辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although we have had similar experiences as reported by Grund et al. (1), we also had one notably different case.We report a case of recurrent cervical stenosis in a 52-year-old patient and treatment with an absorbable adhesion barrier (Interceed; Gynecare, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). Our patient underwent a cone biopsy in 1985 for severe cervical dysplasia, which was immediately followed by cervical stenosis. She presented again 20 years later with abnormal Pap smear results and postmenopausal bleeding. After failures to perform colposcopy, endocervical curettage, or an endometrial biopsy, she was referred to us.
机译:尽管我们有类似Grund等人的报道。 (1),我们还有一个明显不同的案例:我们报告了一例52岁患者复发性颈椎管狭窄症,并使用可吸收的粘连屏障进行治疗(Interceed; Gynecare,Ethicon,Somerville,NJ)。我们的患者于1985年因严重的宫颈不典型增生而进行了锥形穿刺活检,然后立即进行了宫颈狭窄。 20年后,她再次出现异常的子宫颈抹片检查结果和绝经后出血。在未能进行阴道镜检查,宫颈刮宫术或子宫内膜活检后,她被转介给我们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号