...
首页> 外文期刊>Field Crops Research >Above- and below-ground interspecific interaction in intercropped maize and potato: a field study using the 'target' technique.
【24h】

Above- and below-ground interspecific interaction in intercropped maize and potato: a field study using the 'target' technique.

机译:间作玉米和马铃薯间的地上和地下种间相互作用:使用“目标”技术的田间研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The association of maize ( Zea mays L.) and potatoes ( Solanum tuberosum L.) is an overyielding multi-cropping system. However, knowledge on specific interactions in field conditions, especially below-ground interactions, is deficient. To evaluate the nature and strength of interspecific interactions between maize and potatoes, field and pot experiments were conducted using the 'target' technique, with three interaction models: no interaction (NI), below-ground interaction (BI) and full (both above- and below-ground) interaction (FI). Plants were sampled at flowering and harvest periods to measure biomass and calculate the log response ratio (lnRR), root:shoot ratio and land equivalent ratio (LER). In the field experiment, the lnRR value of both BI and FI treatments for potatoes was >0, whereas for maize it was <0. This result accorded with differences in biomass, yield, Harvest Index and root:shoot ratio between the two treatments for both crops. Results showed that maize was subjected to competition (negative interaction), while potatoes obtained facilitation (positive interaction) when they were intercropped. In addition, after flowering there were no significant differences between BI and FI treatments in terms of biomass, lnRR, yield and LER for the two crops. Thus, compared with above-ground interaction, below-ground interaction (i.e. root competition for maize and root facilitation for potatoes) plays a more important role for crop growth and intercropping advantages. In the pot experiment, however, the lnRR values of both BI and FI treatments were <0 for both crops, so potatoes did not obtain a net profit from maize. However, the competitive capability of potatoes were significantly greater than maize when they were intercropped, which is consistent with results from the field experiment. Similarly, there were no significant differences between BI and FI treatments in terms of biomass, lnRR, root:shoot ratio and LER for the two crops. In summary, our study suggests that the root facilitation produced by maize for potatoes is a mechanism for overyielding in the maize-potato intercropping system. The potential of this system merits further research.
机译:玉米(Zea mays L.)和马铃薯(Solanum tuberosum L.)的结合是一种高产的多作系统。但是,缺乏有关野外条件下特定相互作用的知识,尤其是地下相互作用。为了评估玉米和马铃薯之间种间相互作用的性质和强度,使用“目标”技术进行了田间和盆栽实验,并采用了三种相互作用模型:无相互作用(NI),地下相互作用(BI)和完全相互作用(均在上面) -和地下)互动(FI)。在开花期和收获期对植物进行采样,以测量生物量并计算对数响应比(lnRR),根:枝比和土地当量比(LER)。在田间试验中,BI和FI处理的马铃薯lnRR值均> 0,而玉米的lnRR <0。该结果与两种作物的两种处理之间的生物量,产量,收获指数和根:枝比率的差异相符。结果表明,玉米易受竞争(负相互作用),而马铃薯间作则获得了促进作用(正相互作用)。另外,开花后BI和FI处理在两种作物的生物量,lnRR,产量和LER方面无显着差异。因此,与地上相互作用相比,地上相互作用(即玉米的根系竞争和马铃薯的根系促进)对作物生长和间作优势起着更为重要的作用。但是,在盆栽试验中,两种作物的BI和FI处理的lnRR值均小于0,因此马铃薯没有从玉米中获得纯利润。但是,套种马铃薯的竞争能力明显大于玉米,这与田间试验的结果一致。同样,BI和FI处理在两种作物的生物量,lnRR,根:茎比和LER方面也没有显着差异。总而言之,我们的研究表明玉米对马铃薯产生的根系促进作用是玉米-马铃薯间作系统中过度增产的一种机制。该系统的潜力值得进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号