...
首页> 外文期刊>Field Crops Research >Tillage and vegetative barrier effects on soil conservation and short-term economic benefits in the Central Kenya highlands
【24h】

Tillage and vegetative barrier effects on soil conservation and short-term economic benefits in the Central Kenya highlands

机译:耕作和营养屏障对肯尼亚中部高地土壤保持和短期经济利益的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Minimum tillage and vegetative barriers can conserve soil and water resources in the steep-sloping highlands of East Africa but there has been little adoption by smallholder farmers. Soil conservation efficiency and short-term economic benefits provided by tillage and vegetative barriers were assessed over four cropping seasons to understand performance under local farming conditions. Minimum tillage was compared with regular tillage and vegetative barriers (leucaena and Napier) with no barriers. Maize and soybean yields were greater with than, without vegetative barriers, except with Napier barriers when minimum tillage was practiced where strong root competition occured. Cumulatively for the four cropping seasons, Napier barriers with regular tillage conserved most soil (72%) followed by Napier with minimum tillage (53%). The least soil (1%) was conserved for minimum tillage without barriers and leucaena barriers were intermediate in decreasing soil erosion. The highest positive marginal rate of returns (MRRs) were realized under leucaena barriers with regular tillage (2.09) followed by Napier with regular tillage (1.32). Minimum tillage without barriers had the lowest positive MRRs (0.08). Future increase in the price of key inputs would have greater depressive effect on the MRRs of Napier barriers with regular tillage than leucaena barriers with regular tillage. Minimum tillage without barriers was inefficient in soil conservation particularly when rainfall was intense and had poor MRRs. Leucaena barriers conserved less soil than Napier barriers but were more economically attractive, demonstrating a clear trade-off between soil erosion that is likely to impact crop yields in the long-term and short-term economic benefits. Napier barriers with regular tillage present a win-win scenario due to efficient soil conservation and attractive economic returns provided future prices of labour and Napier cuttings remain stable
机译:在东非陡峭的高地上,最低限度的耕作和植物屏障可以保护土壤和水资源,但小农户收养的很少。在四个种植季节内评估了耕作和营养障碍提供的土壤保护效率和短期经济效益,以了解当地耕作条件下的表现。将最低耕作与常规耕作和无障碍的植物屏障(白桦和纳皮尔)进行比较。在没有营养障碍的情况下,玉米和大豆的单产要高于没有营养障碍的情况,只有在发生强烈根系竞争的情况下进行最小耕作的纳皮尔障碍除外。在四个耕种季节中,定期耕作的纳皮尔屏障保护的土壤最多(72%),其次是耕作最少的纳皮尔(53%)。保留最少的土壤(1%)以减少耕作,没有障碍,而白桦树的障碍在减少土壤侵蚀方面处于中等水平。在常规耕作的白斑障碍下实现最高的正边际收益率(MRR)(2.09),其次是常规耕作的纳皮尔(1.32)。没有障碍的最小耕作的最低MRR(0.08)为最低。关键投入物价格的未来上涨将对常规耕种的纳皮尔屏障的MRR产生比常规耕作的Leucaena屏障更大的抑制作用。在没有障碍的情况下进行最小耕作在土壤保护方面效率不高,尤其是在降雨密集且MRR较差的情况下。银合欢屏障比纳皮尔屏障保存的土壤少,但在经济上更具吸引力,这表明在土壤侵蚀之间有一个明显的权衡取舍,长期和短期的经济利益很可能会影响作物的产量。定期耕作的纳皮尔屏障实现了双赢局面,这是因为有效的土壤养护和诱人的经济回报,前提是未来的劳动力价格和纳皮尔er插的价格保持稳定

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号