...
首页> 外文期刊>Field Crops Research >Options for increasing the productivity of the rice-wheat system of north west India while reducing groundwater depletion. Part 2. Is conservation agriculture the answer?
【24h】

Options for increasing the productivity of the rice-wheat system of north west India while reducing groundwater depletion. Part 2. Is conservation agriculture the answer?

机译:提高印度西北部稻麦系统生产力同时减少地下水耗竭的选择。第2部分。保护性农业是否是答案?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The irrigated rice-wheat system of north west India is not sustainable, as currently practised, due to over-exploitation of groundwater, soil degradation, labour scarcity, high fuel and labour costs, and air pollution from stubble burning. Labour and water scarcity are driving farmers to change from puddling and manual transplanting of rice to mechanised dry seeding. The introduction of dry seeding to the rice-wheat system brings with it the potential to adopt conservation agriculture (CA), with reduced or zero tillage for all crops, and surface residue retention. This would further reduce fuel and labour costs for crop establishment, and air pollution, and also bring benefits for soil structure and nutrient cycling. However, whether conversion to CA rice-wheat systems would help solve the problem of groundwater depletion is less well-understood. In this region, evapotranspiration (ET) must be reduced to reduce groundwater depletion. We used the APSIM cropping system model to examine whether conversion from recommended farmer practice (rFP, comprising puddled transplanted rice, alternate wetting and drying rice water management, rice straw removal, tillage for wheat) to a CA rice-wheat system would reduce ET in Punjab, north west India. We also used the model to identify the optimum system management taking into account effects on total cropping system rice equivalent yield (REV), components of the water balance and water productivity. Maximum REV (mean 14.6 t ha(-1)) occurred in systems with 5 June sowing of a popular long duration rice variety, with similar yield for rFP and CA. Irrigation input with CA was much lower (by 390 mm) than with rFP, resulting in slightly higher irrigation water productivity (increased from 11.3 to 11.7 kg ha(-1) mm(-1)). However, changing to CA only reduced ET of the highest yielding system by 4% (55 mm), and of other current practices (late May and early June sowing of medium and long duration varieties) by less than this. The only way to achieve a substantial reduction in ET was by growing short duration rice varieties in both the rFP and CA systems. However, with current short duration varieties, this came at the cost of both rice and system yields (system yield reduced by an average of about 1.8 t ha(-1)). This could be overcome by intensification to 3 crops per year in a CA rice-wheat-mung system (with short duration rice varieties), while still providing a substantial but smaller decrease in ET. This system also had considerable flexibility in rice sowing date, with similar system yields for sowings from 5 June to 15 July. These findings suggest that greater effort to increase the yield potential of short duration rice varieties is warranted. Field experimentation is needed to test the improved systems as suggested by the model simulations, particularly in terms of cropping system yield and ET, and alternatives to rice and wheat should also be evaluated. At the same time, spatial hydrological studies are needed to determine the sustainable level of ET from cropping systems that will allow matching of groundwater depletion and recharge. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:按照目前的做法,印度西北部的稻米/小麦灌溉系统不可持续,原因是地下水的过度开发,土壤退化,劳动力稀缺,燃料和人工成本高以及发茬燃烧造成的空气污染。劳动力和水资源的短缺正促使农民从混泥土和人工移栽水稻转向机械化播种。在稻麦系统中引入干种使其具有采用保护性农业(CA)的潜力,对所有农作物的耕作减少或减为零,且表面残留物保持不变。这将进一步减少农作物的燃料和人工成本以及空气污染,并为土壤结构和养分循环带来好处。但是,转换为CA稻麦系统是否有助于解决地下水枯竭的问题,人们对此知之甚少。在该地区,必须减少蒸散量(ET)以减少地下水的消耗。我们使用APSIM种植系统模型检查了从推荐的农民实践(rFP,包括成批的插秧稻米,交替的湿润和干燥稻米水管理,稻秸秆去除,小麦耕作)到CA稻麦系统的转化是否会降低ET印度西北部的旁遮普邦。我们还使用该模型确定了最佳系统管理,其中考虑了对总种植系统水稻当量产量(REV),水平衡要素和水生产率的影响。在6月5日播种一个受欢迎的长期水稻品种的系统中出现最大的REV(平均14.6 t ha(-1)),rFP和CA的产量相似。与CA相比,CA的灌溉输入量要低得多(由390毫米降低),从而导致灌溉水生产率稍高(从11.3千克ha(-1)mm(-1)升高)。但是,改用CA只会使最高产量系统的ET减少4%(55毫米),而其他现行做法(5月下旬和6月初播种的中长期品种)的ET减少幅度小于此水平。实现ET大幅降低的唯一方法是在rFP和CA系统中种植短时水稻品种。但是,对于当前的短时品种,这是以水稻和系统单产的代价为代价的(系统单产平均降低了约1.8 t ha(-1))。可以通过在CA水稻-小麦-蒙系统(使用短时水稻品种)中每年增产3种作物来克服这一问题,同时仍能使ET下降幅度较大,但幅度较小。该系统在水稻播种日期方面也具有相当大的灵活性,从6月5日至7月15日播种的系统产量相似。这些发现表明,有必要加大努力提高短期水稻品种的产量潜力。如模型模拟所建议的,需要进行田间试验以测试改良的系统,特别是在种植系统的单产和ET方面,还应评估水稻和小麦的替代品。同时,需要进行空间水文研究来确定作物系统可持续的ET水平,从而使地下水的枯竭和补给相匹配。 (C)2014 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号