【24h】

PET TOPICS

机译:宠物话题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the past five years or so, certainly since the financial impact of the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the trials and tribulation of the world banking and financial system, there has been considerable debate as to what the effects would be on petownership and spending on pets in general.Spending on pets, some economists would argue, is discretionary spending, particularly as regards non-pet food items such as toys. When incomes come under pressure, as they have done in much of Europe and North America, one might reasonably expect spending on pets to assume a slightly lower priority.Except that this doesn't appear to be the case. The American Pet Products Association's annual survey puts the overall spend in the US pet industry for 2013 at an all-time high of more than $55.7 billion, 4.5 per cent up on spending in 2012. And, as regards 2014, the APPA's annual spending and data report estimates the overall spend for 2014 at $58.51 billion, up by 4.9 per cent over 2013 and a figure which, given the US economy's recovery, may prove to be conservative.
机译:在过去的五年左右的时间里,肯定是自雷曼兄弟(Lehman Brothers)倒闭以及世界银行业和金融体系的考验和磨难对金融的影响以来,关于所有权对宠物的影响和对宠物的影响已经引起了广泛的争论一些经济学家认为,宠物的支出是可自由支配的支出,特别是在玩具等非宠物食品方面。当收入受到压力时(就像在欧洲和北美大部分地区一样),人们可能会合理地期望在宠物方面的支出将处于稍低的优先级,但事实并非如此。美国宠物产品协会的年度调查显示,2013年美国宠物行业的整体支出超过557亿美元,创历史新高,比2012年的支出高出4.5%。此外,就2014年而言,APPA的年度支出和数据报告估计,2014年的总体支出为585.1亿美元,比2013年增长4.9%,考虑到美国经济的复苏,这一数字可能被认为是保守的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号