首页> 外文期刊>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology: Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Opthalmologie >Myopic choroidal neovascularization treated by intravitreal bevacizumab: comparison of two different initial doses
【24h】

Myopic choroidal neovascularization treated by intravitreal bevacizumab: comparison of two different initial doses

机译:玻璃体内贝伐单抗治疗近视脉络膜新生血管:两种不同初始剂量的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Myopic maculopathy is the leading cause of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in patients under 50 years of age. New antiangiogenic drugs are being used off-label with varied therapeutic schedules to treat CNV. The aim of this study is to report the anatomical and visual outcomes of myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) treated by two different schedules with intravitreal bevacizumab.Methods Prospective, comparative, consecutive, non-randomized, multicentric, interventional pilot study. Two groups of highly myopic patients with subfoveal and juxtafoveal CNV were treated by monthly intravitreal injections with 1.25 mg bevacizumab. Group 1 comprised 19 eyes treated by three consecutive monthly intravitreal injections. Group 2 comprised 20 eyes treated by one single intravitreal injection. Patients were evaluated for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline and then monthly. Fluorescein angiography was performed at baseline and when CNV activity was suspected. Further intravitreal injections were performed if CNV activity was detected.Results Both groups were matched for age, spherical equivalent, LogMAR BCVA, and central foveal thickness (CFT) as determined by OCT at baseline and number of eyes with previous PDT treatment. The average number of letters gained was 6.3 in group 1 vs 7.2 in group 2 (p= 0.001 and 0.09 respectively, Student's t-test for paired data). Changes in OCT were not significant for either group by the end of follow-up. The mean number injections performed was 3.2 in group 1 vs 1.7 in group 2 (p=0.00, Mann-Whitney test). Four recurrences (four eyes) occurred in group 1 vs 15 (seven eyes) in group 2 (p=0.001; Fisher's exact test).Conclusions Both schedules achieved similar results improving BCVA, though the second group required a lower number of injections, showing a higher rate of recurrences during the first year.
机译:背景近视性黄斑病变是50岁以下患者黄斑下脉络膜新生血管(CNV)的主要原因。新的抗血管生成药物正以非常规方式用于治疗CNV的标签。这项研究的目的是报告玻璃体腔注射贝伐单抗通过两种不同的方案治疗近视脉络膜新生血管(CNV)的解剖学和视觉结果。方法前瞻性,比较,连续,非随机,多中心,介入性试验研究。通过每月玻璃体内注射1.25 mg贝伐单抗治疗两组高度近视的小凹下和近凹型CNV患者。第一组包括通过连续三个月度玻璃体内注射治疗的19只眼睛。第2组包括通过一次玻璃体内注射治疗的20只眼睛。在基线时然后每月对患者进行最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)评估。在基线和怀疑CNV活动时进行荧光素血管造影。如果检测到CNV活性,则再进行玻璃体内注射。结果两组患者的年龄,球面当量,LogMAR BCVA和中央凹中心厚度(CFT)相匹配,这是由OCT在基线和先前接受过PDT治疗的眼数确定的。第一组的平均字母获取数量为6.3,而第二组为7.2(分别为p = 0.001和0.09,配对数据的学生t检验)。随访结束时,两组的OCT变化均不显着。第一组的平均注射数为3.2,而第二组为1.7(p = 0.00,Mann-Whitney检验)。第1组发生4例复发(四只眼),而第2组则有15例(七只眼)(p = 0.001; Fisher精确检验)。第一年的复发率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号