首页> 外文期刊>Ear, nose and throat journal >Is routine analysis of pediatric tonsillectomy specimens worth the money? [Editorial].
【24h】

Is routine analysis of pediatric tonsillectomy specimens worth the money? [Editorial].

机译:儿科扁桃体切除术标本的常规分析值得吗? [社论]。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Each year, more than half a million children in the United States undergo tonsillectomy. Most of these procedures are performed for either sleep-disordered breathing or recurrent infections. Despite the frequency with which the procedure is performed, there is little consensus on how the resulting specimens should be handled. Most of the time, the tonsils are sent to a pathologist, who looks for evidence of more serious medical problems, such as unsuspected lymphoma.Pathologists examine tonsillectomy specimens in two ways: a visual, or "gross," examination and microscopy. Microscopic examination is nearly three times more expensive than visual inspection. According to a 2001 survey of American Academy of Otolaryngology members, 42% of specimens receive gross analysis, 38% are examined under the microscope, and 20% are discarded without examination.
机译:每年,美国有超过半百万儿童接受扁桃体切除术。这些程序大多数用于睡眠呼吸困难或反复感染。尽管执行该过程的频率很高,但在如何处理所得标本上却几乎没有共识。在大多数情况下,扁桃体会被送到病理学家那里,病理学家会寻找更严重的医学问题的证据,例如未怀疑的淋巴瘤。病理学家会以两种方式检查扁桃体切除标本:视觉检查或“大体”检查和显微镜检查。显微镜检查的成本是视觉检查的近三倍。根据2001年美国耳鼻咽喉科医师协会的一项调查,有42%的标本接受了大体分析,有38%的标本在显微镜下进行了检查,有20%的标本未经检查即被丢弃。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号